Molecular markers

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates generally to genetic sequences exhibiting differential expression patterns in cancer tissue relative to normal tissue. The identification of differentially expressed genetic sequences permits their use as molecular markers for cancer, as early indicators of cancer progression and/or as predictive markers for a propensity or likelihood of a cancer to develop. The present invention relates particularly to genetic sequences exhibiting expression patterns up-regulated in cervical cells or associated with pre-, early- or late-onset cervical cancer relative to normal cervical cells. The genetic sequences of the present invention provide markers for early- or late-onset cervical cancer and/or a cancer related to cervical cancer. The markers of the present invention further provide potential targets for the development of therapeutic protocols for the treatment or prophylaxis of cervical or related cancer. Such therapeutic protocols are directed to inhibiting expression of the marker or inhibiting the expression product of the marker. The present invention is further directed to a method for identifying molecular markers which are useful indicators of cervical cancer and/or its progression.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0001] The present invention relates generally to genetic sequences exhibiting differential expression patterns in cancer tissue relative to normal tissue. The identification of differentially expressed genetic sequences permits their use as molecular markers for cancer, as early indicators of cancer progression and/or as predictive markers for a propensity or likelihood of a cancer to develop. The present invention relates particularly to genetic sequences exhibiting expression patterns up-regulated in cervical cells or associated with pre-, early- and/or late-onset cervical cancer relative to normal cervical cells. The genetic sequences of the present invention provide markers for pre-, early- or late-onset cervical cancer and/or a cancer related to cervical cancer. The markers of the present invention further provide potential targets for the development of therapeutic protocols for the treatment or prophylaxis of cervical or related cancer. Such therapeutic protocols are directed to inhibiting expression of the marker or inhibiting the expression product of the marker. The present invention is further directed to a method for identifying molecular markers which are useful indicators of cervical cancer and/or its progression.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] Bibliographic details of the publications referred to by author in this specification are collected at the end of the description.

[0003] The reference to any prior art in this specification is not, and should not be taken as, an acknowledgment or any form of suggestion that that prior art forms part of the common general knowledge in Australia.

[0004] Cervical carcinoma is one of the most common tumors affecting women world-wide, both in incidence and mortality, with approximately 471,000 new cases diagnosed and about 200,000 women die of the disease annually. (Pisani, et al., 1993 and 1997). In 1994, an estimated 15,000 women in the U.S. were diagnosed with invasive cervical carcinoma and approximately 4600 women died from this disease in the year despite remarkable progress made in screening (Boring et al., 1994). In 1995, the incidence increased to 15,800 cases and 4800 deaths in the U.S. (Wingo, et al., 1995).

[0005] Cervical carcinoma has its origins at the squamous-columnar junction either in the endocervical canal or on the portio of the cervix. The precursor lesion is dysplasia or carcinoma in situ (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN]), which can subsequently become invasive cancer. This process can be quite slow. It is proposed that 50% of dysplastic lesions disappear without treatment and 10% of dysplastic lesions reach the final stage of the intra-epithelial lesion prior to invasion of subjacent tissue. Only 2% of the total number of dysplasias progress beyond this intra-epithelial carcinoma to frank invasive cancer (Ostor, 1993; Duggan, 1998). However, longitudinal studies have shown that in untreated patients with in situ cervical cancer, 30-70% will develop invasive carcinoma over a period of 10-12 years. Only in about 10% of patients, lesions can progress from in situ to invasive in less than a year (Gustafsson, et al., 1989; Van Oortmarssen, et al., 1991).

[0006] With reference to cell types, cervical cancer can be classified into squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma. Cellular Classification Squamous cell (epidermoid) carcinoma comprises approximately 80%, while adenosquamous and small cell carcinomas are relatively rare. However, among malignancies of the uterine cervix, the percentage of adenocarcinomas seems to have increased in recent reports, from 4.9-20% (Berek, et al., 1981; Goodman et al., 1989; Vizcaino, et al., 1998). Controversy remains over whether or not adenocarcinoma of the cervix carries a significantly worse prognosis than squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix (Steren et al., 1993). There are conflicting reports regarding the effect of adenosquamous cell type on outcome (Gallup et al., 1985; Yazigi et al., 1990). A report demonstrated that approximately 25% of apparent squamous tumors have demonstrable mucin production and behave more aggressively than their pure squamous counterparts suggesting that any adenomatous differentiation may confer a negative prognosis (Bethwaite et al., 1992). A study of patients with known invasive squamous carcinoma of the cervix found that over-expression of the c-myc oncogene was associated with poorer prognosis significance in early cervical carcinoma (Strang et al., 1987).

[0007] It is estimated that more than 6 million women in the U.S. have human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Epidemiological studies convincingly demonstrate that the major risk factor for the development of pre-invasive or invasive carcinoma of the cervix is related to HPV infection. Studies (Brisson et al., 1994) suggest that acute infection with HPV types 16 and 18 conferred a one to 16.9-fold risk of rapid development of high-grade CIN. This far outweighs other known risk factors such as high parity, increasing number of sexual partners, young age at first intercourse, low socioeconomic status and positive smoking history (Schiffman et al., 1993; Brisson et al., 1994). Although molecular techniques for the identification of HPV DNA are highly sensitive and specific, proper interpretation of these data is important. Some patients with HPV infection appear to be at minimal increased risk for development of cervical preinvasive and invasive malignancies while others appear to be at significant risk and candidates for intensive screening programs and/or early intervention. However, use of a positive HPV DNA test as the only parameter to dictate more in-depth evaluation of the patient may lead to unwarranted and ineffective treatment and/or unnecessary patient anxiety. Conversely, current technology may be too insensitive to detect small amounts of potentially tumorigenic HPV types leading to a false sense of security. Clearly the present recommendation for patients with an abnormal cervical cytology of a high-risk type (Bethesda Classification) should be thoroughly evaluated with colposcopy and biopsy. However, these tests are expensive and can be invasive.

[0008] Uterine cervical carcinogenesis has been recognized as a multi-stage process in which human papillornavirus (HPV) infection and other factors, such as somatic genetic alterations play a decisive role in the development of malignant cancer. The accumulation of cytogenetic abnormalities and chromosome structural aberrations or allele loss may lead to the selection of the final tumor phenotype, consistent with the long time that occurs between initial infection and tumor appearance (Herrington et al., 1995; Lazo, 1999).

[0009] Identification of these genes can be used for the cancer diagnosis and also to help stratify women into follow-up and treatment groups.

[0010] The prognosis for cervical cancer is markedly affected by the extent of disease at the time of diagnosis (Anton-Culver, et al., 1992). Among the major factors that influence prognosis are stage, volume and grade of tumor, histologic type, lymphatic spread, and vascular invasion (Werner-Wasik, et al., 1995). However, the molecular pathways leading to cervical dysplasia remain poorly understood. To gain a global view of the molecular events leading to turnour progression, the inventors have employed differential gene display as a systematic method to compare gene expression in human cervical cancer and matched normal tissues.

[0011] In work leading up to the present invention, the inventors identified differentially expressed DNA sequences which have corresponding RNA accumulated to higher levels in various stages of human cervical cancer. Activation of some of these genes in the early clinical stages of cervical cancer suggests their participation in pathways involved in the onset and/or progression of cancer providing diagnostic markers for the cervical cancer and targets for therapeutic intervention.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0012] Throughout this specification, unless the context requires otherwise, the word “comprise”, or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated element or integer or group of elements or integers but not the exclusion of any other element or integer or group of elements or integers.

[0013] Nucleotide and amino acid sequences are referred to by a sequence identifier number (SEQ ID NO:). The SEQ ID NOs: correspond numerically to the sequence identifiers SEQ ID NO:1, SEQ ID NO:2, etc. A sequence listing is provided after the claims.

[0014] The inventors utilize RT-PCR differential display analysis and cDNA microarrays to identify cellular genes involved in the multi-step carcinogenesis of squamous cell cervical carcinoma. cDNA clones are identified and cloned by differential gene expression display between cervical cancer biopsies and matched normal cervical tissues. These cDNA clones are consistently over-expressed in squamous cell cervical carcinoma biopsies of various FIGO stages using cDNA microarrays. Northern blot analysis and RNA-RNA in situ hybridization studies using cervical cancer biopsies of various FIGO stages is used to evaluate the role of these genes in disease progression. Two clones are identified as encoding NADH dehydrogenase 4 and ribosomal protein S12, respectively, when compared to sequences available in the GenBank database. The expression of these two genes is elevated in the matched normal tissues collected together with the late FIGO stages of cervical cancer biopsies. Increased expression of ribosomal protein S12 is also found in the immature basal epithelial cells of histo-pathological normal tissue collected from cervical cancer patients of early FIGO stages. In comparison, up-regulation of these two genes is not detected in cervical squamous epithelium collected from patients admitted for surgery for non-malignant conditions suggesting that expression of these two genes may have altered in the adjacent histo-pathologically “normal” cervical squamous epithelial tissue from cervical cancer patients. It is proposed that the ribosomal protein S12 and the NADH dehydrogenase 4 gene provide early diagnostic markers for human cervical cancer and to define a molecular margin for progressive disease

[0015] Accordingly, an aspect of the present invention provides a method for detecting a molecular marker associated with normal or abnormal tissue from a mammal, said method comprising isolating total RNA from said abnormal tissue and corresponding tissue from a non-abnormal individual, generating complementary DNA molecules using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and subjecting said DNA molecules to separation means such that the presence or absence or relative presence or absence of complementary DNA molecules can be detected from abnormal tissue relative to non-abnormal tissue wherein the presence or absence of a complementary DNA molecule in one type of tissue relative to another is indicative of a molecular marker associated with normal or abnormal tissue.

[0016] Another aspect of the present invention provides a method for identifying a molecular marker capable of distinguishing between a cancerous condition and a non-cancerous condition, said method comprising isolating total RNA from cancer tissue from an individual and from matched non-cancer tissue from another individual, generating complementary DNA molecules using RT-PCR and comparing said DNA molecules from said cancer and non-cancer tissue by gel electrophoresis wherein the presence or absence of a particular DNA species in cancer or non-cancer tissue relative to the other of non-cancer or cancer tissue, respectively is indicative of a molecular marker for said cancer.

[0017] Still another aspect of the present invention provides a genetic sequence comprising a sequence of nucleotides which is expressed differentially in cervical cancer cells relative to matched normal cervical epithelial cells.

[0018] A summary of sequence identifiers used throughout the subject specification is provided below.

SUMMARY OF SEQUENCE IDENTIFIERS

[0019] SEQUENCE ID NO: DESCRIPTION 1 Primer for identification of differentially displayed gene fragment P21 2 Primer for identification of differentially displayed gene fragment P30 3 Primer for identification of differentially displayed gene fragment P31 4 Primer for identification of differentially displayed gene fragment 32 5 Clone G30CA cDNA fragment 6 Clone G30CB cDNA fragment 7 Clone G30CC cDNA fragment 8 Clone G30CD cDNA fragment 9 Clone G30CE cDNA fragment 10 Clone G30CH cDNA fragment 11 Clone G30CI cDNA fragment 12 Clone G30CK cDNA fragment 13 Clone G31C4B cDNA fragment 14 Clone G31C4C cDNA fragment 15 Clone G31C5C cDNA fragment 16 Clone G31C5D cDNA fragment 17 Clone G31C5E cDNA fragment 18 Clone G31C5G cDNA fragment 19 Clone G31C6A cDNA fragment 20 Clone G31C6B cDNA fragment 21 Clone G32C2A cDNA fragment 22 Clone G32C2B cDNA fragment 23 Clone G32C2C cDNA fragment 24 Clone G32C3A cDNA fragment 25 Clone G32C3B cDNA fragment 26 Clone G32C3C cDNA fragment 27 Clone G32C4B cDNA fragment 28 Clone G32C4D cDNA fragment 29 Clone G32C5A cDNA fragment 30 Clone G32C6 cDNA fragment 31 Clone G32C7 cDNA fragment

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

[0020]FIG. 1 is photographic representation showing differentially displayed analyzes of cDNA fragments of normal and human squamous cell carcinoma biopsies. One μg total RNA extracted from six cervical cancer biopsies and their matched normal tissue was reverse transcribed with P21 (3′-GTTTTTTTTTTTCGAA-5′ [SEQ ID NO:1]) primer and subsequently amplified in parallel PCR in the presence of [α-³³P]dATP by using P21 primer with either P30 (5′-AAGCTTGGTGACA-3′ [SEQ ID NO:2]); P31 (5′-AAGCTTAGTCAAG-3′ [SEQ ID NO:3]); or P32 (5′-AAGCTTCCACAGC-3′ [SEQ ID NO:4]) primer pair. Following gel electrophoresis, the differential expressed gene fragments displayed by autoradiography.

[0021]FIG. 2 is a representation showing cDNA microarray analysis of the expression of 40 of the 44 cDNA clones isolated by differential display in different FIGO stags of human cervical squamous cell carcinoma biopsies. Data are presented in a matrix format: each row represents results obtained from a single cDNA clone and each column an experimental sample. Columns 1-10 represent the 10 cervical squamous cell carcinoma patients from which biopsies and matched normal epithelium were taken. The stages of disease are shown for each patient. For each sample, the ratio of the abundance of transcripts of each clone in the cancer biopsy to the abundance of the same clone's transcript detected in adjacent histo-pathologically normal epithelium tissues is represented by the color of the corresponding cell in the matrix. Green squares indicate transcript levels below the controls, red squares indicate transcript levels greater than that of the controls, while black squares indicate transcript levels equal to the controls. The controls used were β-2-microglobulin, α-tubulin, cyclophilin, β-actin, ubiquitin and G3PDH. Grey squares represent technically inadequate or missing data for that particular cell in the matrix.

[0022]FIG. 3 is a photographic representation showing quantitative analysis of reverse Northern blot. Hybridization reactivity of reverse Northern blot was detected by PhosphorImager. The fold increase in hybridization reactivity with the cDNA probe derived from the cancer biopsy compared to that of the corresponding cDNA probe derived from normal tissue were demonstrated. 28 clones showed significantly up-regulated in cancer tissue.

[0023]FIG. 4 is a photographic representation showing cDNA library screening for the full-length cDNA of G32C4B. 53 positive clones were obtained using ClonCapture cDNA Selection Kit, from the Hela cDNA library with biotinylated G32C4B probe (A). 7 positive cDNA clones with longer insert captured by G32C4B probe were sequenced and were found to be homologous to the NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4 gene (more than 98% identical) throughout the lengths (B).

[0024]FIG. 5 is a photographic representation showing Northern blot analysis of clones G30CC and G32C4B in different FIGO stages of human cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Twenty mg of total RNA obtained from cancer biopsies of different FIGO stages and their corresponding adjacent normal epithelium were employed for Northern blot hybridization. G3PDH was employed as an internal control to normalize the amount of RNA.

[0025]FIG. 6 is a photographic representation showing cDNA library screening for the full-length cDNA of G30CC. 122 positive clones were obtained using ClonCapture cDNA Selection Kit, from the Hela cDNA library with biotinylated G30CC probe (A). 7 positive cDNA clones with longer insert captured by G30CC probe were sequenced and were found to be homologous to the ribosomal protein S12 mRNA (more than 98% identical) throughout the lengths (B).

[0026]FIG. 7 is a photographic representation showing Northern blot analysis of clone G32C4B and clone G30CC expression in human cervical biopsies. Twenty μg of total RNAs obtained from human cervical cancer biopsies of different FIGO stages and their adjacent normal tissues were employed for Northern bolt hybridization. G3PDH was employed for as an internal control to normalize the amount of RNA. The net fold increase in gene expression was determined following exposure of the membranes and quantitation by densitometric scanning using the BioRad FX PhosphorImager (BioRad, Richmond, Calif.).

[0027]FIG. 8 is a photographic representation showing Northern blot analysis of clone G30CA and clone G32C7 expression in human cervical biopsies. Twenty μg of total RNAs obtained from human cervical cancer biopsies of different FIGO stages and their adjacent normal tissues were employed for Northern bolt hybridization. G3PDH was employed for as an internal control to normalize the amount of RNA. The net fold increase in gene expression was determined following exposure of the membranes and quantitation by densitometric scanning using the BioRad FX PhosphorImager (BioRad, Richmond, Calif.).

[0028]FIG. 9 is a photographic representation showing Northern blot analysis of clone G31C5G, clone G31CI and clone G32C2B expression in human cervical biopsies. Twenty μg of total RNAs obtained from human cervical cancer biopsies of different FIGO stages and their adjacent normal tissues were employed for Northern bolt hybridization. G3PDH was employed for as an internal control to normalize the amount of RNA. The net fold increase in gene expression was determined following exposure of the membranes and quantitation by densitometric scanning using the BioRad FX PhosphorImager (BioRad, Richmond, Calif.).

[0029]FIG. 10 is a photographic representation showing RNA-RNA in situ hybridization for G32C4B. Tissue sections of 10 μm thickness were prepared from human cervical cancer biopsies of different FIGO stages (1B, 2A, 2B and 3B), as well as the adjacent normal tissue. Consecutive tissue sections were either hybridized with DIG-labeled anti-sense or sense probe derived from clone G32C4B. Hematoxylin and Eosin staining was employed for histological identification. The magnification shown was 600×.

[0030]FIG. 11 is a photographic representation showing RNA-RNA in situ hybridization for G30CC. Tissue sections of 10 μm thickness were prepared from human cervical cancer biopsies of different FIGO stages (1B, 2A, 2B and 3B), as well as the adjacent normal tissue. Consecutive tissue sections were either hybridized with DIG-labeled anti-sense or sense probe derived from clone G30CC. Hematoxylin and Eosin staining was employed for histological identification. The magnification shown was 600×.

[0031]FIG. 12 is a photographic representation showing RNA-RNA in situ hybridization studies of clones G30CC and G32C4B with normal cervical squamous epithelium, cervical squamous cell carcinoma adjacent epithelium collected from early or late FIGo and squamous cell carcinoma biopsies. Consecutive tissue sections of 10 μm were hybridized to DIG-labeled anti-sense or sense probe derived from clone G30CC or G32C4B. Hematoxylin and Eosin staining was employed for histology identification. Representative results obtained from clones G30CC and G32C4B to four different cervical tissue biopsies are presented. (A) Normal cervical squamous epithelium collected from non-malignant patient; (B) adjacent histo-pathological normal tissues obtained from an early stage cervical squamous cell carcinoma patient; (C) adjacent histo-pathological normal tissues obtained from a late stage cervical squamous cell carcinoma; and (D) a squamous cell biopsy section. The scale bar in the figures represents 80 μm. (BL, basal-layer epithelial cells; PL, par-layer epithelial cells; ST, stromal cells; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.)

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0032] The present invention is predicated in part on the use of techniques to identify differentially expressed genetic sequences between cancerous tissue and corresponding or “matched” normal tissue. The identification of genetic sequences differentially expressed, that is, up- or down-regulated in cancer cells relative to the normal cells provides a useful diagnostic aid.

[0033] Accordingly, one aspect of the present invention provides a method for detecting a molecular marker associated with normal or abnormal tissue from a mammal, said method comprising isolating total RNA from said abnormal tissue and corresponding tissue from a non-abnormal individual, generating complementary DNA molecules using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and subjecting said DNA molecules to separation means such that the presence or absence or relative presence or absence of complementary DNA molecules can be detected from abnormal tissue relative to non-abnormal tissue wherein the presence or absence of a complementary DNA molecule in one type of tissue relative to another is indicative of a molecular marker associated with normal or abnormal tissue.

[0034] The term “molecular marker” is used in its broadest sense and includes genetic sequences, genetic loci, genes, telomerases, promoters and coding and non-coding regions. Preferably, the molecular marker is a gene. More particularly, the preferred molecular marker of the present invention is a gene which is expressed in either normal or abnormal tissue but not both. The term “expressed” includes substantial expression or substantial non-expression and further includes differential expression between one form of tissue relative to another form of similar or the same tissue.

[0035] Reference herein to “normal” or “abnormal” tissue is used in its broadest sense but most preferably includes non-cancerous tissue (normal tissue) and cancerous or pre-cancerous tissue (abnormal tissue). An abnormal tissue type includes tissue generally present in an individual with a disease condition associated with the presence of this abnormal tissue but is generally absent from individuals not suffering from the same or similar condition.

[0036] The present invention extends to all mammals such as humans, primates, livestock animals (e.g. sheep, cows, pigs, horses, donkeys, goats), companion animals (e.g. dogs, cats), laboratory test animals (e.g. rabbits, mice, guinea pigs, hamsters) and captured wild animals. Most preferably, the mammal is a human. Reference herein to an “individual” includes a human or other mammal.

[0037] The term “total RNA” is not to imply the presence of all RNA in a cell or individual but includes any preparation which comprises mRNA.

[0038] A “corresponding tissue” means a matched tissue sample. For example, biopsy samples are generally obtained from the cancer tissue of an individual and corresponding (i.e. matched) tissue samples are obtained from the anatomically equivalent region in an individual without the same or similar cancer.

[0039] The term “separation means” is used in its broadest sense and includes any means by which DNA molecules can be separated based on size, charge, length, complexity or a combination of some or all of the above. Preferably, the separation is by electrophoretic or chromatographic means and most preferably the separation is by electrophoretic means. Conveniently, the separation provides a visual record of complementary DNA molecules present or absent in normal tissue relative to abnormal tissue. Accordingly, generally, the complementary DNA, preparations are separated by electrophoretic or chromatographic means in a manner which permits a comparison of molecules present or absent in normal tissue relative to abnormal tissue. Gel electrophoresis is one particularly useful separation means with complementary DNA preparations being run in parallel lanes.

[0040] Although the present invention is most conveniently practiced by preparing complementary DNA for abnormal and normal tissue, a database of expected DNA in normal tissue can be prepared. The presence or absence of a particular species of complementary DNA can then be ascertained by comparing DNA separated by abnormal tissue with a “normal control”.

[0041] In a particularly preferred embodiment, there is provided a method for identifying a molecular marker capable of distinguishing between a cancerous condition and a non-cancerous condition, said method comprising isolating total RNA from cancer tissue from an individual and from matched non-cancer tissue from another individual, generating complementary DNA molecules using RT-PCR and comparing said DNA molecules from said cancer and non-cancer tissue by gel electrophoresis wherein the presence or absence of a particular DNA species in cancer or non-cancer tissue relative to the other of non-cancer or cancer tissue, respectively is indicative of a molecular marker for said cancer.

[0042] In a most preferred embodiment, the cancer is cervical cancer or a related cancer. The present invention extends, however, to the use of the subject method to detect molecular markers for any cancer or turnour. Reference herein to a “cancer” or “tumor” includes reference to all sarcomas and carcinomas.

[0043] In a significant subset of cancers, large numbers of genes are altered in expression thereby leading to an abnormal phenotype. The altered expression patterns may facilitate initiation or progression of a neoplasm, subsequently resulting in invasive behaviour of the tumor. On the other hand, some alteration of gene expression may be the result of tumorigenesis. The former provides crucial information concerning the molecular mechanism(s) leading to cancer, while the latter may serve as markers for specific steps occurring in this process.

[0044] In accordance with the present invention, using differential display techniques, the fingerprints of cDNA fragments amplified from cancer biopsies taken at different stages together with cDNA from matched normal tissue were displayed in the same gel to define specific diagnostic alterations between cervical cancer biopsies and normal tissue. cDNA fragments (Table 1) were cloned from RT-PCR differential display with primers. Based on reverse Northern blot analysis, the expression of 28 clones were confirmed to be significantly increased in the cancer biopsies with net fold increase ranging from 1.7 to 4.3 (FIG. 3). Among the amplified genes, eleven of the clones identified could be associated with energy consumption (G32C3B and G32C4B); signal transudation (G30CI and G31C6A); transcription regulation (G32C2B); translation (G30CA and G30CC); biosynthesis (G32C7, and G31C5E); and cellular metabolism (G30CD and G32C6) (Table 1).

[0045] Eleven of the 28 clones, viz. G30CE, G30CK, G31C4C, G31C5B, G31C5C, G31C5D, G31C5G, G32C2A, G32C3C, G32C4D and G32C5A appear to be novel gene sequences as they did not match to any the reported gene sequence in the GeneBank or EST databases (Table 1).

[0046] Northern blot analysis indicated that seven particular genes, designated herein are “G30CA”, “G30CC”, “G31C5G”, “G32C4B”, and “G32C7” involved in early stage development of cervical carcinoma (FIGS. 6-8).

[0047] Of particular interest, two of these genes, namely G32C4B and G30CC, have been identified to be the NADH dehydrogenase 4 gene and the gene that encodes ribosomal protein S12, respectively. The over-expression of these two genes in cancer biopsies obtained from early invasive cell lesion of the uterine cervix indicates that these two genes are involved in the pathogenesis of human cervical neoplasia (FIG. 6). Most importantly, it was observed that, besides cancer lesions, the expression of G32C4B and G30CC could be detected in adjacent presumably histologically normal cervical tissues. The NADH dehydrogenase 4 and the ribosomal protein S12 genes can therefore provide significant value as an early diagnostic marker for human cervical cancer and to define a molecular margin for progressive disease (FIGS. 9 and 10).

[0048] Accordingly, another aspect of the present invention provides a genetic sequence comprising a sequence of nucleotides, which is expressed differentially in cervical cancer cells relative to matched normal cervical epithelial cells (Table 2).

[0049] The present invention extends to these sequences as well as derivatives thereof. A derivative is a genetic sequence comprising a single or multiple amino acid substitution, addition and/or deletion relative to a sequence referred to in Table 1.

[0050] Although the present invention is most conveniently practised by detecting differentially expressed nucleotide sequences, the instant invention extends to translation products and in particular peptides, polypeptides and proteins encoded by the differentially expressed nucleotide sequences. The differential expression as determined by the presence or absence of particular translation products is also a useful way of screening for molecular markers of normal or abnormal tissue. Accordingly, the present invention further extends to antibodies to the differentially expressed molecular markers associated with normal or abnormal tissue. Antibodies and in particular monoclonal antibodies are useful inter alia in immunoassays to screen for the presence of a differentially expressed product and may also be useful in immunotherapy.

[0051] The use of monoclonal antibodies in an immunoassay and in immunotherapy is particularly preferred because of the ability to produce them in large quantities and the homogeneity of the product. The preparation of hybridoma cell lines for monoclonal antibody production derived by fusing an immortal cell line and lymphocytes sensitized against the immunogenic preparation can be done by techniques which are well known to those who are skilled in the art. (See, for example, Douillard and Hoffman, Kohler and Milstein, 1975; 1976).

[0052] Another aspect of the present invention contemplates a method for detecting a molecular marker associated with normal or abnormal tissue in a biological sample from a subject, said method comprising contacting said biological sample with an antibody specific for said molecular marker or its derivatives or homologs for a time and under conditions sufficient for an antibody-molecular marker complex to form, and then detecting said complex.

[0053] The presence of the molecular marker may be accomplished in a number of ways such as by Western blotting and ELISA procedures. A wide range of immunoassay techniques are available as can be seen by reference to U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,016,043, 4,424,279 and 4,018,653. These, of course, includes both single-site and two-site or “sandwich” assays of the non-competitive types, as well as in the traditional competitive binding assays. These assays also include direct binding of a labelled antibody to a target.

[0054] Sandwich assays are among the most useful and commonly used assays and are favoured for use in the present invention. A number of variations of the sandwich assay technique exist, and all are intended to be encompassed by the present invention. Briefly, in a typical forward assay, an unlabelled antibody is immobilized on a solid substrate and the sample to be tested brought into contact with the bound molecule. After a suitable period of incubation, for a period of time sufficient to allow formation of an antibody-antigen complex, a second antibody specific to the antigen, labelled with a reporter molecule capable of producing a detectable signal is then added and incubated, allowing time sufficient for the formation of another complex of antibody-antigen-labelled antibody. Any unreacted material is washed away, and the presence of the antigen is determined by observation of a signal produced by the reporter molecule. The results may either be qualitative, by simple observation of the visible signal, or may be quantitated by comparing with a control ample containing known amounts of molecular marker. Variations on the forward assay include a simultaneous assay, in which both sample and labelled antibody are added simultaneously to the bound antibody. These techniques are well known to those skilled in the art, including any minor variations as will be readily apparent. In accordance with the present invention, the sample is one which might contain a molecular marker including cell extract, tissue biopsy or possibly serum, saliva, mucosal secretions, lymph, tissue fluid and respiratory fluid. The sample is, therefore, generally a biological sample comprising biological fluid but also extends to fermentation fluid and supernatant fluid such as from a cell culture.

[0055] In a typical forward sandwich assay, a first antibody having specificity for the molecular marker or antigenic parts thereof, is either covalently or passively bound to a solid surface.

[0056] The solid surface is typically glass or a polymer, the most commonly used polymers being cellulose, polyacrylamide, nylon, polystyrene, polyvinyl chloride or polypropylene. The solid supports may be in the form of tubes, beads, discs of microplates, or any other surface suitable for conducting an immunoassay. The binding processes are well-known in the art and generally consist of cross-linking covalently binding or physically adsorbing, the polymer-antibody complex is washed in preparation for the test sample. An aliquot of the sample to be tested is then added to the solid phase complex and incubated for a period of time sufficient (e.g. 2-40 minutes or overnight if more convenient) and under suitable conditions (e.g. from room temperature to 40° C. such as between 25° C. and 32° C. inclusive) to allow binding of any subunit present in the antibody. Following the incubation period, the antibody subunit solid phase is washed and dried and incubated with a second antibody specific for a portion of the molecular marker. The second antibody is linked to a reporter molecule which is used to indicate the binding of the second antibody to the molecular marker.

[0057] An alternative method involves immobilizing the target molecules in the biological sample and then exposing the immobilized target to specific antibody which may or may not be labelled with a reporter molecule. Depending on the amount of target and the strength of the reporter molecule signal, a bound target may be detectable by direct labelling with the antibody.

[0058] Alternatively, a second labelled antibody, specific to the first antibody is exposed to the target-first antibody complex to form a target-first antibody-second antibody tertiary complex. The complex is detected by the signal emitted by the reporter molecule.

[0059] By “reporter molecule”, as used in the present specification, is meant a molecule which, by its chemical nature, provides an analytically identifiable signal which allows the detection of antigen-bound antibody. Detection may be either qualitative or quantitative. The most commonly used reporter molecules in this type of assay are either enzymes, fluorophores or radionuclide containing molecules (i.e. radioisotopes) and chemiluminescent molecules.

[0060] In the case of an enzyme immunoassay, an enzyme is conjugated to the second antibody, generally by means of glutaraldehyde or periodate. As will be readily recognized, however, a wide variety of different conjugation techniques exist, which are readily available to the skilled artisan. Commonly used enzymes include horseradish peroxidase, glucose oxidase, -galactosidase and alkaline phosphatase, amongst others. The substrates to be used with the specific enzymes are generally chosen for the production, upon hydrolysis by the corresponding enzyme, of a detectable color change. Examples of suitable enzymes include alkaline phosphatase and peroxidase. It is also possible to employ fluorogenic substrates, which yield a fluorescent product rather than the chromogenic substrates noted above. In all cases, the enzyme-labelled antibody is added to the first antibody-molecular marker complex, allowed to bind, and then the excess reagent is washed away. A solution containing the appropriate substrate is then added to the complex of antibody-antigen-antibody. The substrate will react with the enzyme linked to the second antibody, giving a qualitative visual signal, which may be further quantitated, usually spectrophotometrically, to give an indication of the amount of molecular marker which was present in the sample. “Reporter molecule” also extends to use of cell agglutination or inhibition of agglutination such as red blood cells on latex beads, and the like.

[0061] Alternately, fluorescent compounds, such as fluorecein and rhodamine, may be chemically coupled to antibodies without altering their binding capacity. When activated by illumination with light of a particular wavelength, the fluorochrome-labelled antibody adsorbs the light energy, inducing a state to excitability in the molecule, followed by emission of the light at a characteristic color visually detectable with a light microscope. As in the EIA, the fluorescent labelled antibody is allowed to bind to the first antibody-molecular marker complex. After washing off the unbound reagent, the remaining tertiary complex is then exposed to the light of the appropriate wavelength, the fluorescence observed indicates the presence of the molecular marker of interest. Immunofluorescene and EIA techniques are both very well established in the art and are particularly preferred for the present method. However, other reporter molecules, such as radioisotope, chemiluminescent or bioluminescent molecules, may also be employed.

[0062] The antibodies according to this aspect of the invention may also be used in immunotherapy such as but not limited to acting as antagonists for abnormal tissue associated with translation products. For example, where a translation product is a protein which facilitates the formation of abnormal tissue such as cervical cancer tissue, the administration of an antibody directed to the translation product may be useful in preventing its function associated with abnormal tissue development.

[0063] Accordingly, another aspect of the present invention contemplates a method for the treatment of an individual with abnormal tissue, said method comprising administering an immuno-interactive molecule directed to a molecular marker associated with the development of said abnormal tissue for a time and under conditions sufficient for the function of the molecular marker to be impaired thus reducing its ability to facilitate abnormal tissue development.

[0064] Preferably, the abnormal tissue is cervical cancer tissue.

[0065] Preferably, the molecular marker is a peptide, polypeptide or protein.

[0066] This aspect of the invention may alternatively be practised by the administration of a genetic molecule and reducing expression of the molecular marker. Examples of suitable genetic molecules include inter alia antisense molecules, ribozymes or sense molecules for co-suppression.

[0067] The present invention is further described by the following non-limiting Examples.

EXAMPLE 1 Tissue Collection and RNA Isolation

[0068] Biopsies were collected from patients with squamous carcinoma of the cervix. Punch biopsies with tischler forceps were taken from the tumor lesion for histo-pathological assessment as well as for RNA analysis. For histo-pathological analysis, the tissues were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and processed into paraffin blocks. Multiple step sections were made and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Where indicated, PAS with and without diastase digestion and mucicarmine stains were performed. Tissues collected for RNA analysis were snapped frozen in liquid nitrogen. Wherever possible, normal cervical tissues far away from the tumor areas were taken for controls. The staging of cancer was done according to recommendations by the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynacology (FIGO) [FIGO News, 1987). To avoid repetition in evaluating gene expression in the same patient, different patients were included in different studies. In total, 38 cervical cancer patients in various stages of the disease and five non-cervical cancer patients were studied. For all experiments, total cellular RNA was isolated using TRIzol Reagent (Gibco, BRL, Life Technologies, Grand Island, N.Y.) according to the manufacturer's manual and stored at −80° C. before being employed in experiments.

EXAMPLE 2 RT-PCR Differential Display

[0069] Total RNA was isolated from normal and cervical cancer biopsies and samples were treated with RNase-free DNase I (Promega, Madison, Wis.) to remove potential chromosomal DNA contamination. About 1 μg each of total RNAs from normal and cancer biopsies were used for reverse transcription.

[0070] First-strand cDNAs were synthesized by using an one-base anchored oligo-dT P21 as primer, amplified in parallel PCRs in the presence of [α-³³P]dATP by using 3 combinations of P30, P31 or P32 primers individually. The PCR cycling parameters were as follows: 40 cycles of 94° C. for, 30 sec, 40° C. for 2 min and 72° C. for 30 sec, followed by 72° C. for 10 min. The PCR products together with size markers were then separated on a 5.7% w/v denaturing polyacrylamide gel containing 7 M urea. The sequencing gel was run to resolve cDNA fragments sized from 150 bp to 1000 bp. Differentially expressed bands were cut out of the gel and cDNA fragments eluted by boiling the gel pieces in 100 μl H₂O for 15 min and were then used as templates for PCR re-amplification using the same condition as described above. A portion of the re-amplified PCR product was analyzed on a 2% w/v agarose gel to check the efficiency of re-amplification and to confirm the size of cDNA fragments. All PCR primers employed for reverse transcription and PCR were obtained from Gibco BRL (Life Technologies, Grand Island, N.Y.). Primers used included: P21 3′-GTTTTTTTTTTTCGAA-5′(SEQ ID NO:1); P30 5′-AAGCTTGG TGACA-3′(SEQ ID NO:2); P31 5′-AAGCTTAGTCAAG-3′(SEQ ID NO:3); P32 5′-AAGCTTCCACAGC-3′(SEQ ID NO:3). AmpliTaq DNA polymerase was purchased from Perkin-Elmer Corp. (Norwalk, Conn.). [α-³³P]dATP (2000 Ci/mmole) was obtained from New England Nuclear (Boston, Mass.). Denaturing polyacrylamide gel (5.7% w/v) containing 7 M urea was made using Gel-Mix 6 (Gibco BRL, Life Technologies, Grand Island, N.Y.).

EXAMPLE 2 cDNA Cloning and Sequencing

[0071] Re-amplified cDNA fragments were cloned into either the pCR2.1 vector using the TA cloning system from Invitrogen (San Diego, Calif.) or the pCR-TRAP Vector from GenHunter (GenHunter Corp. Nashville, Tenn.). DNA sequencing was performed either using Sequenase Kit Version 2.0 (United States Biochemical, Cleveland, Ohio), or by automated sequencing using ABI Prism 377 DNA Sequencer (Perk-in-Elmer Corp., Norwalk, Conn.). The nucleotide sequences obtained were analyzed by BLAST search (National Centre for Biotechnology Information).

EXAMPLE 3 cDNA Microarray Fabrication and Hybridization

[0072] cDNA clones were amplified in 100 μl PCR reactions, 5 μl PCR product was analyzed on a 2% w/v agarose gel after which the remaining PCR products were purified by isopropanol precipitation, resuspended in 15 μl 3×SSC and printed onto poly-L-lysine (Sigma Microsystems Inc., Woburn, Mass.). Housekeeping genes including G3PDH, β-actin, β-2-microglobulin, α-tubulin, cyclophilin and ubiquitin were also spotted as internal controls for normalization. Each slide was hydrated for 2-3 sec over a steaming 100° C. water-bath, snap-dried for 5 sec on a 100° C. heating block and crosslinked with 550 mJ ultraviolet irradiation using a Stratalinker (Stratagene, LaJolla, Calif.). The slide was then washed for 10 min in 0.2% w/v SDS and rinsed 5× in distilled water before being denatured for 5 min in 100° C. distilled water, desiccated for 5 min in 95% v/v ethanol and air-dried for 5 min in an 80° C. oven.

[0073] Comparative hybridizations were carried out using cDNA reverse-transcribed from total RNA isolated from tumor biopsies and matched adjacent normal tissue of 10 individual cervical cancer patients in varying stages of disease. Total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA, labelled with Cy3 (for tumor cDNA) and Cy5 (normal cDNA) fluorescent dyes and hybridized onto the slides according to the 3DNA (trade mark) Expression Array Detection Kit protocol recommendations (Genisphere Inc., Montvale, N.J.). Labelled cDNA from cancer and normal tissues were hybridized simultaneously onto a single glass slide in 10 separate hybridizations. Humidified microarray hybridization cassettes were used to contain all slides during hybridization incubations (TeleChem International Inc., Sunnyvale, Calif.). Hybridized microarrays were scanned using a GMS 418 laser scanner (Genetic Microsystems Inc, Woburn, Mass.). Separate images were acquired for Cy3 and Cy5. The signal and background signals were then quantified with Imagene 3.0 quantification software (BioDiscovery Inc., Los Angeles, Calif.). Generated signal values were analyzed and visualized using Cluster and Treeview programs (M. Eisen, University of California, Berkeley; http://rana.lbl.gov/).

[0074] Signals were measured as the mean pixel intensity within each circumscribed spot and background was measured using the mean pixel intensity outside the circumscribed spot diameter within a specific square location. Spots which were contaminated with fluorescent specks or other blemishes, or where background values were higher than the spot signal were considered as missing. The signal intensities from both Cy3 and Cy5 channels were normalized by applying a single scaling factor computed by taking the ratio of the total signal intensities of each channel such that the signal intensities of internal controls on each array would have a Cy3/Cy5 ratio of 1.0. Spots that gave signals of 2.5-fold or more difference in comparison to the normal controls would be considered as differentially expressed.

EXAMPLE 4 Reverse Northern Blot

[0075] Two μg gene fragment from each clone, as well as different amount of α-actin (0.5, 1, 2, or 4 μg) were blotted on a Hybond-N⁺ nylon transfer membrane (Amersham, Piscataway, N.J.) using a slot-blot apparatus, while α-actin was used as an internal control. After 5 min denaturation at room temperature with 1.5 M NaCl, 0.5 M NaOH, and 5 min neutralization at room temperature with 1.5 M NaCl, 1 M Tris-HCl pH 7.4, the DNA was fixed to the membrane by incubation at 80° C. for 2 hr. ³²P-labeled cDNA probes were prepared by reverse transcription with 30 μg total RNA isolated either from pooled tumor biopsies from six patients or from their matched normal biopsies. The reaction was performed by incubation at 42° C. for 1 h in the presence of 1000 U SuperScript™ (trade mark) II reverse transcriptase (GibcoBRL, Life Technologies, Grand Island, N.Y.), with 5 μM Oligo(dT)₁₆ primer (Perkin-Elmer Corp. Norwalk, Conn.), 10 mM DTT, 0.1 mM dGTP/dTTP mix, 60 μCi [α-³²P]dATP and [α-³²P]dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol, NEN, Boston, Mass.). RNAs were then hydrolyzed by a 30 min incubation at 65° C. with 9 μl 3 N NaOH in 70 μl reaction volume, and followed by neutralization with adding 30 μl 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 9 μl 2 N HCl and 22 μl H₂O. Unincorporated nucleotides were removed by NucTrap probe Purification Columns (Stratagene, LaJolla, Calif.). Hybridization was performed at 40° C. with either normal or cancer cDNA probe at 4×10⁶ cpm/ml in presence of sheared salmon sperm DNA (Sigma, Mo.). The net fold increase was calculated as the ratio gene expression obtained with the probe derived from RNA of cancerous tissue over the level obtained from RNA of normal tissues after normalization with α-actin.

EXAMPLE 5 Northern Blot Analysis

[0076] Twenty μg of total RNA isolated from cancer biopsies or their adjacent histo-pathologically normal tissues were employed for Northern blot analysis. After electrophoresis, the RNA was transferred to Hybond-N⁺ nylon transfer membrane (Amersham, Piscataway, N.J.) and probed with random hexa-nucleotide-primed ³²P-labeled cDNAs clones using high prime DNA labeling kit (Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Unincorporated nucleotides were removed by NucTrap probe Purification Columns (Stratagene, LaJolla, Calif.). Hybridization and washes were performed as described previously (Soong, et al., 1992). Hybridization to the housekeeping gene G3PDH cDNA probe (Clontech Laboratories Inc., Palo Alto, Calif.) was used to quantitate the loading of RNA. After hybridization and washing, the membranes were exposed. For analysis, the radioactivity associated with each band was quantitated by densitometric scanning using the BioRad, Richmond, Calif.).

EXAMPLE 6 PhosphorImager Analysis

[0077] After hybridization and washing, the membranes were exposed. For analysis, the radioactivity associates with each band was quantitated by densitometric scanning using the BioRad FX PhosphorImager (BioRad, Richmond, Calif.)

EXAMPLE 7 RNA-RNA in Situ Hybridization

[0078] The RNA-RNA in situ hybridization was performed by DIG (digoxigenin)-labeled cRNA probe using DIG RNA labeling Kit (Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Two sub-clones with opposite orientation of the gene fragment insert were selected further to produce sense and anti-sense probe. The labeling reaction was carried out according to the manufacturer's protocol using DIG RNA labeling Kit. After linearization of the template DNA at BamH1 site, 75 U of T7 RNA polymerases were used in the presence of DIG-UTP to synthesis DIG-labeled transcripts.

[0079] The cancer biopsies and their matched normal tissue were collected from the patients in different cancer stages. Biopsies were cut into 10 μm thick frozen section and were mounted directly on the microscope slides. The tissue sections were fixed by incubating at 50° C. for 2 min, at room temperature for 30 min, and a subsequently incubation at room temperature with PBS containing 4% v/v paraformaldehyde for 7 min, then for 3 min with PBS followed by 2 washes with 2×SSC for 5 min each. The pre-hybridization was performed by incubating at 37° C. for 1 hr in block solution containing 5% w/v skim milk powder, 4×SSPE, 50% v/v deionized formamide, 30 μg herring sperm DNA, 1% w/v SDS and DEPC-treated H₂O. 200 ng/ml of DIG-labeled anti-sense cRNA probe or sense cRNA probe were then incubated with tissue section at 37° C. overnight in hybridization buffer (16.6% w/v dextran sulfate, 5% w/v skim milk powder, 4×SSPE, 50% v/v deionized formamide, 1% w/v SDS and DEPC-treated H₂O). The slides were subsequently washed twice with 2×SSC at room temperature for 5 min. The tissue sections were incubated at room temperature for 2 hr with 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5 and 150 mM NaCl buffer containing 1% w/v BSA and 0.5% w/v α-alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-DIG antibody (BM, MannLein, Germany). For the colour development, the tissue section slides were soaked 0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 9.5, 0.1 M NaCl, 0.05 M MgCl₂, 3.4% NBT, 1.8% BCIP, 2.4% levamisole at room temperature overnight in the dark. The color reaction was stopped by incubating the slides in 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8 and 1 mM EDTA at room temperature for 5 min and soaked in H₂O for 5 min at room temperature. ollowing counter-staining staining in Hematoxylin (BDH Laboratory Supplies, Dorset, England) for 2-5 sec, the tissue section slides were washed with H₂O at room temperature and mounted with coverslps in Kaiser's glycerol gelatin solution (Merk KgaA, Darmstadt, Germary).

[0080] For the hematoxylin and eosin staining, tissue sections were soaked in hematoxylin (filtered hematoxylin contains 1 ml acetic acid v/v) for 4 min and washed in H₂O, followed by dipping into 0.5% v/v acid alcohol (0.5% v/v HCl in 75% v/v alcohol) for 2 sec and subsequently washed in H₂O. Tissue sections were then soaked in eosin solution (1% v/v eosin stock solution: 70% alcohol=1:3) for 3 min and washed by running H₂O. Slides were viewed with the Olympus BX 60 microscope (Olympus Optical Co. Ltd).

EXAMPLE 8 Identification of Differentially Displayed cDNA Fragments from Human Cervical Cancer Biopsies

[0081] cDNA were reverse transcribed using total RNA isolated from six biopsies obtained from patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix of different FIGO stages. RNA isolated from the corresponding adjacent histo-pathologically normal epithelial tissues were similarly amplified and their gene expression profiles compared in order to identify tumor-specific alterations (FIG. 1). Cervical cancer biopsies of different FIGO stages were utilized in order to avoid isolating “false positive” differentially displayed cDNA fragments from a specific type of tumor biopsy (Liang et al., 1994). The inventors hypothesized that true differentially displayed bands that are important for carcinogenesis should be generally up-regulated or down-regulated in most, if not all, cervical cancer samples when compared to the adjacent normal samples and that these bands should be reproducibly generated by differential display analysis. To ensure reproducibility, all PCR reactions including the RT reactions were performed in triplicates and each PCR product was applied in different electrophoretic separation in denaturing polyacrylamide gels with different running time. The patterns of amplified PCR products from six independent samples of mRNAs from cancer biopsies or matched histo-pathologically normal tissues showed comparable identical banding patterns for each of the primer sets employed (FIG. 1).

[0082] In general, it was observed that the majority of the PCR bands generated from the cancer biopsies showed higher intensity than their corresponding normal counterparts (FIG. 1). With the three primer sets P21-P30, P21-P31 or P21-P32 tested. Eighteen bands were demonstrated to be distinctly different between the cDNA bands generated from mRNAs of cancer biopsies and the corresponding matched normal control tissues (FIG. 1). Fourteen of these 18 bands were found to be up-regulated in the cancer biopsies and four bands (G31N1, G31N2, G31N3 and G32CN) were down-regulated (FIG. 1). Seventeen of the 18 bands were successfully extracted from the acrylamide gels, reamplified and cloned individually into either pCR-TRAP or pCR2.1 vectors. A total of 44 clones were identified. Gene fragments from G31N1 and G31N2 were considered as the same gene as they had identical sequences. All cloned cDNA fragments were subsequently sequenced and their sizes were found to be between 176 to 425 bp in length (Table 1). All clones were confirmed to have the expected primer sequences at their respective 5′ and 3′ ends upon sequencing. The inventors have also employed a pooled RNA sample obtained by pooling the RNA samples from the six patients that were employed for differential display for reverse Northern blot analysis. This was to confirm the clones which expression were up-regulated as detected by the differential display study (FIG. 1). The result obtained with this analysis was by and large comparable to that obtained via cDNA microarray analysis (FIG. 2).

[0083] To confirm that the expression of these 44 isolated clones was amplified in human cervical cancer, reverse Northern blot analyses were performed. Of the 44 cDNA clones isolated, the expression of 28 clones were confirmed to be significantly increased in the cancer biopsies with net fold increase ranging from 1.7 to 4.3 (FIGS. 2 and 3). The sequences of these 28 clones are listed in Table 2. From the differential display studies, it was observed that the expression of clones G31N1, G31N3, and G32N were higher in normal tissues in comparison to cancer tissues (FIG. 1). However, this observation could not confirmed with the reverse Northern blot analysis (FIG. 2) and the inventors have, therefore, regarded these three clones to be false positives.

EXAMPLE 9 Profile of Gene Expression of the cDNA Clones in Different FIGO Stages

[0084] To study the potential role of the 44 cDNA clones in the pathogenesis of human cervical cancer, the gene expression profile of these 44 clones in 10 cervical carcinoma biopsies were compared with their corresponding adjacent normal tissues using cDNA microarrays. cDNA microarrays were generated by printing the DNA purified from the 44 cDNA clones in duplicates onto coated glass slides. Among the 10 pairs of tissue biopsies studied, three pairs were obtained from stage 1B cancer patients, two from stage 2A and stage 2B and three from stage 3B.

[0085] Results obtained from the cDNA analyses demonstrated u-regulated expression of 25 of the 44 clones in all 10 cervical cancer patients (FIG. 2).

[0086] The inventors reasoned that for a gene to be potentially employed as a diagnostic marker, its RNA should be in abundance. Twenty-two of the 25 clones that have been confirmed to be up-regulated by microarray analysis were employed as probes for Northern blot analysis with RNA isolated from the four cervical cancer cell lines, HeLa, CaSKi, SiHa and HT-3. Nine of the clones demonstrated a strong hybridization signal. They were then chosen as probes for subsequent Northern blot analyses of RNA purified from human cervical squamous cell carcinoma biopsies of various FIGO stages and that of adjacent normal epithelium. It was observed that two of the clones, namely G30CC and G32C4B, showed elevated levels of expression in cervical cancer biopsies of early FIGO stages (FIG. 5). In comparison to adjacent histo-pathological normal epithelium, the expression of clone G30CC was up-regulated by approximately 5-fold in stage 2A cancer tissues while G32C4B was also up-regulated by a similar magnitude in stage 1B cancer tissues. The expression of these two clones were apparently also elevated in the adjacent histo-pathologically normal epithelium collected from the late FIGO stage patients (FIG. 5).

[0087] Late cervical cancer tissues would include patients of FIGO stages 2B and 3B and in whom the carcinoma extends beyond the cervix with obvious parametrial involvment (FIGO News, 1987).

[0088] To study the identity of clones G32C4B and G30CC, the inventors employed these clones as probes for the isolation of the corresponding full-length cDNA genes by screening a cDNA library derived from the HeLa human cervical cancer cell line. Using ClonCapture cDNA Selection Kit, representative positive clones were isolated from the HeLa cDNA library using G32C4B or G30CC as probes. The cDNA obtained were sequenced and they were found to be homologous to the reported NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4 gene and the ribosomal protein S12 mRNA, respectively.

EXAMPLE 10 Sequence Analysis

[0089] Through the BLASTN sequence search (National Centre for Biotechnology Information), it was determined that 28 of the 44 cloned cDNA fragments are either homologous to previously reported genes in the Genebank or to expressed sequence tags (EST) (Table 1). It was found that the cDNA sequences of G30CC, G30CD, G30CI, G30CJ, G31C5H, G32C3B, G32C4B and G32C7 were located within the coding region of the reported gene sequence and that the sequences of clones G31C4B and G32C2C were in the reverse orientation with respect to the reported homologous sequence. The sequences for clones G30CB and G31C6B were also found to be in the reverse orientation in relationship to the reported sequences of two isolated EST clones. Eleven of the 28 clones, viz. G30CE, G30CK, G31C4C, G31C5B, G31C5C, G31C5D, G31C5G, G32C2A, G32C3C, G32C4D and G32C5A appear to be novel gene sequences as they did not match to any the reported gene sequence in the GeneBank or EST databases (Table 1).

[0090] When the sequences of clones G32C4B and G30CC were blasted to the GeneBank for homology search, the search results showed that clone G32C4B was homologous to the reported NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4 gene with 100% identity (Table 1). On the other hand, clone G30CC was homologous to the ribosomal protein S12 mRNA with 99% identity (Table 1).

[0091] To further confirm the identity of clones G32C4B and G30CC, the inventors employed clones G32C4B and G30CC as probes to isolate the corresponding full-length cDNA genes by screening a cDNA library derived from the human Hela cell line. Representative positive clones, obtained using ClonCapture cDNA Selection Kit, from the Hela cDNA library with either G32C4B or G30CC as probes were sequenced and again found to be homologous to the NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4 gene and the ribosomal protein S12 mRNA respectively. The full-length cDNA clones obtained were then employed as probes for Northern blot analyses and the results were similar to those obtained with G32C4B or G30CC (FIGS. 4 and 6).

EXAMPLE 11 Expression of the Cloned cDNA Fragments in Different FIGO Stages of Human Cervical Cancer

[0092] To study the potential role of the newly isolated cDNA in the pathogenesis of human cervical cancer, the inventors employed the nine of the 28 isolated clones to probe mRNA purified from human cervical cancer biopsies of various pathological stages. Earlier studies by the inventors have shown that these nine clones gave strong hybridization signals with RNA purified from human cervical cancer cell lines.

[0093] mRNA from cervical cancer biopsies of FIGO stages 1B, 2A, 2B and 3B along with the matched normal tissue biopsies were isolated. It was observed that clone G32C4B expressed strongly in all the stage 1B human cervical cancer samples studied (FIG. 7). The level of expression of G32C4B was more than 5 times higher than that of the corresponding matched normal biopsies (FIG. 7). Interestingly, it appeared that the overall gene expression of clone G32C4B reduced in relationship to the matched normal tissues as disease progress (FIG. 7). The expression of G32C4B was significantly reduced in cervical cancer at stage 2A (FIG. 7) and its expression in stages 2B and 3B human cervical cancers specimens were similar to that of the matched normal (FIG. 7). These results suggest that the expression of clone G32C4B peaked at the early onset of disease.

[0094] The expression of clone G30CC in stage 1B cervical cancer was approximately three folds over that of the matched normal biopsies (FIG. 7). This difference increased to approximately five folds for stage 2A cervical cancer in comparison to that of matched normal biopsies (FIG. 7). However, the level of expression of G30CC appeared to peak for stage 2A cervical cancer and it dropped to a level of expression comparable to that of the matched normal biopsies for cervical cancer tissues obtained from patients at later stages of disease (FIG. 7).

[0095] Similarly, the expression of clones G30CA, G32C7 and G31C5G was relatively high compared to the corresponding normal tissues for cervical cancer tissues obtained from patients with disease at early stages (FIGS. 8 and 9). However, when cervical cancer tissues obtained from late stages of diseases were studied, their level of expression was comparable to that of the corresponding matched normal tissues (FIGS. 8 and 9).

[0096] Clone G30CI only weakly hybridized to human cervical cancer biopsies obtained at various stages (FIG. 9). Clone G30CK failed to detect any expression in the cancer and normal tissue biopsies.

EXAMPLE 12 RNA-RNA in Situ Hybridization

[0097] The results obtained from the inventors' Northern blot analyses indicated that the expression of G32C4B and G30CC also elevated in the matched normal tissues collected together with the late clinical stages of cervical cancer biopsies. To explore the possible significance of G32C4B and G30CC amplification in the matched normal biopsies towards the late FIGO stages and the cell types involved, the inventors conducted RNA-RNA in situ hybridization study.

[0098] G32C4B and G30CC probes were synthesized in both the anti-sense and sense orientations as described in materials and methods and employed for in situ hybridization studies. Histological identification was carried out in consecutive sections following H&E staining of the sections. Cervical cancer biopsies of various FIGO stages were studied along with their matched normal tissues. Two patients for each of the FIGO stages were studied and the results of one representative patient were shown.

[0099] Strong hybridization signals for G32C4B and G30CC could be detected consistently in the cytoplasm of squamous carcinomas of FIGO stages 1B, 2A, 2B and 3B (FIGS. 10 and 11). In comparison, only weakly hybridization signals could be detected in adjacent fibromuscular stroma cells for all the various stages of cervical cancer biopsies studied (FIGS. 10 and 11). No hybridization signal could be detected in the normal squamous cells of matched adjacent tissues obtained from stage 1B cervical cancer patients with the G32C4B anti-sense probe (FIG. 10). On the other hand, although no hybridization signal could be detected with the G32C4B probe in the para-epithelial cell layers, faintly positive hybridization signals could be detected within the basal and immature epithelial cell layers in the matched adjacent tissues obtained from stage 2A cervical cancer patients (FIG. 10). Similarly, the G30CC anti-sense probe did not hybridized to the para-epithelial cell layers in matched normal tissues obtained from both FIGO stages 1B and 2A cervical cancer patients, positive hybridization signals were detected within the basal immature epithelial cell layers (FIG. 11). More significantly, when the matched normal tissues obtained from FIGO stages 2B and 3B cervical cancer patients were studied with G32C4B and G30CC anti-sense probes, strong hybridization signals could be obtained in histologically normal epithelial cell layers (FIGS. 10 and 11). The hybridization signals were most intense in the basal immature epithelial cells (FIGS. 10 and 11).

EXAMPLE 13 Level of Gene Expression of NADH Dehydrogenase Subunit 4 Gene and Ribosomal Protein S12 in Adjacent Normal Tissues of Cervical Cancer Tissues

[0100] The results obtained from the inventors' Northern blot analyzes indicated that the expression of NADH dehydrogenase 4 and the ribosomal protein S12 gene was also elevated in the adjacent normal epithelium collected together with the late clinical stages of cervical cancer biopsies. To confirm the possibility that the NADH dehydrogenase 4 gene and the ribosomal protein S12 gene are progressively up-regulated in cancer adjacent biopsies as the cancer progresses, as well as the cell types involved, the inventors conducted RNA-RNA in situ hybridization studies. Squamous cell cervical carcinoma biopsies of various FIGO stages, along with their corresponding adjacent normal tissues were employed for in situ hybridization. A total of 14 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix and their corresponding adjacent normal tissues were studied and representative results were shown in FIG. 12.

[0101] The up-regulated expression of the ribosomal protein S12 gene was detected within the basal immature epithelial cell layers (BL) in 10 out of 10 adjacent histo-pathological normal epithelium of early stage cervical cancer patients (eight patients of stage 1B and six patients of stage 2A) (FIG. 12B). No hybridization signal could be found in the para-layers epithelial cells (PL) in all of these tissue sections. Overall, only weak hybridization signals could be detected within the basal immature epithelial cell layers for the NADH dehydrogenase 4 gene in adjacent histo-pathological normal tissues of early stage cervical cancer patients (2 out of 10 patients) (FIG. 12B). As expected, NADH dehydrogenase 4 gene and the ribosomal protein S12 hybridized strongly to all stage cervical cancer tissues (FIG. 12D). In comparison, when the adjacent histo-pathologically normal tissues of late stage cervical cancer patients were studied, strong hybridization signals for the NADH dehydrogenase 4 gene and the ribosomal protein S12 gene were obtained in all the presumably histologically normal epithelial cell layers (4 out of 4 patients studied) (FIG. 12C). The hybridization signals were most intense in the basal immature epithelial cells (FIG. 12C). The negative control demonstrated that NADH dehydrogenase 4 gene and the ribsomal protein S12 gene did not hybridize to normal cervical epithelium obtained from patients who were admitted for surgery for non-malignant conditions (FIG. 12A).

EXAMPLE 14 Clinical Implication of Molecular Marker

[0102] CIN lesions are induced by persistent HPVs. The detection of high risk HPV infection has been proposed as a useful marker to diagnose cervical cancer. However, infection induced by high-risk HPV types is found in about 10% of healthy normal woman without clinical evidence of cervical lesions (Kjaer et al., 1997). Most high risk HPV infections usually last only for several months (Ho et al., 1998). The peak incidence of the disease occurs in women over 40 years of age; however, the peak incidence for HPV infection is in the 20s, therefore, there is a long latency period between the time of HPV infection and cancer appearance (Lazo, 1999). Therefore, an HPV-based screening program would both lead to over-investigation of many women and fail to identify a proportion of cases.

[0103] On the other hand, the vast majority of low-grade CIN lesions regress spontaneously, and only very few persist or progress to high-grade cervical dysplasia. Ostor (1993) reported that the approximate likelihood of regression of CIN 1 is 60%, persistence 30%, progression to CIN 3 10%, and progression to invasion 1%. The corresponding approximations for CIN 2 are 40%, 40%, 20%, and 5%, respectively. The likelihood of CIN 3 regressing is 33% and progressing to invasion greater than 12%. A later investigation, indicated that 11% of CIN I lesions on average progress to a higher grade dysplasia and the remainder either regress or persist (Duggan, 1998).

[0104] Treatment of cervical lesions is totally dependent on histopathologic judgment of whether or not a lesion is invasive. This distinction can be extremely difficult to assess, especially in small biopsy specimens and curettage material. A sensitive and objective diagnostic procedure determining the invasive potential of cervical neoplastic cells would, therefore, be of substantial value. Alternatively, despite the low risk for progression, currently all of the high-grade CIN lesions are removed by surgical resection (conization) to securely avoid the development of invasive carcinomas because there is no criterion that allows us to differentiate regressing or persisting lesion from those that will progress. Thus, the lack of progression marker results in a significant number of over treated women, whose lesions would have spontaneously cured. As morphology by itself does not predict which lesion will progress or regress, future efforts should seek factors other than morphological to determine the prognosis in individual patients.

[0105] Moreover, residual, recurrent, and persistent disease was most common in patients with incompletely excised CIN at ectocervical and endocervical margins and deep margins of resection than in patients with completely excised CIN (Zaitoun et al., 2000). One report suggested that despite extrafascial hysterectomy for presumed adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS) of the cervix, a residual focus could remain and present later as invasive adenocarcinoma (Krivak et al., 2000). At long term follow up, patients with CIN who have residual disease are at increased risk of persistent disease and should, therefore, be followed up regularly. Since ACIS is not reliably diagnosed by cervical cytology and colposcopy, patients undergoing conservative management have been typically followed by endocervical curettage (ECC) in combination with Papanicolaou smear. Conversely, the ECC was positive in only 43% of patients with glandular lesions (Poynor et al., 1995). Hence, Pap smears in combination with ECC still inadequate for the detection of the recurrence of cervical adenocarcinoma.

[0106] Once cervical cancer is diagnosed, clinical staging takes place. Early-stage tumors can be managed with cone biopsy or simple hysterectomy. Higher stage tumors can be treated surgically or with radiotherapy. Advanced metastatic disease may respond to radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy. After these treatments, protein markers are needed for the detection of recurrence (Canavan et al., 2000).

[0107] Recurrent cervical carcinoma has very poor prognosis, mainly because there is no effective systemic therapy which would increase the duration of survival (Piamsomboon et al., 1996). 5-year survival rate of recurrent cervical cancer was only 5% (Burke et al., 1989). However, following radical hysterectomy for stage I-IIA cervical carcinoma, 10%-15% of women will have a recurrence. Sixty percent of these recurrences will be located in the pelvis alone (Lanciano, 1996). The mean time-to-recurrence was 21.7 months and greater proportions of patients were with adenocarcinoma, lymph-node metastasis, and involved surgical margins. Routine follow-up Pap smear seemed to be a poor indicator of disease status (Tay et al., 1997).

[0108] Therefore, a major problem in the diagnosis of patient with cancer is the lack of specific tumor markers, for early detection, for the accurate prediction of biological behavior and for accurate assessment of prognosis. Results by the inventors indicated that the NADH dehydrogenase 4 and the ribosomal protein S12 genes could provide significant value as an early diagnostic marker for human cervical cancer and to define a molecular margin for progressive disease. Furthermore, during the postoperative follow-up of patients with localized cancer of the uterine cervix the measurement of NADH 4 or ribosomal protein S12 might lead to the early detection of recurrent disease when curative therapy is still an option.

[0109] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention described herein is susceptible to variations and modifications other than those specifically described. It is to be understood that the invention includes all such variations and modifications. The invention also includes all of the steps, features, compositions and compounds referred to or indicated in this specification, individually or collectively, and any and all combinations of any two or more of said steps or features. TABLE 1 Genes that are over-expressed in squamous cell carcinoma Differential Reverse cDNA Best match in GenBank database display Northern Blot microarray (Accession Number) G30CA G30CA G30CA Human 16S ribosomal RNA (6137796) G30CB G30CB Human EST yu04f09* (H72762) G30CC G30CC G30CC Human ribosomal protein S12 (RPS12) mRNA (NM_001016) G30CD G30CD G30CD Human mRNA for collagenase (X05231) G30CE G30CE G30CE No match G30CH G30CH G30CH Human ZNF01 and HUMORFKGIB genes (AF205588) G30CI G30CI G30CI Human guanine nucleotide binding protein β5 (GNB5) (NM_006578) G30CJ G30CJ Human ribosomal protein L13a (RPL13A) mRNA (NM_012423) G30CK G30CK No match G30CM Human chromosome X clone RP1-298J18 (AL096764) G31C1 G31C1 Human STS WI-15569 (G21217) G31C2 G31C2 No match G31C3 G31C3 No match G31C4A Human GAP-associated tyrosine phosphoprotein p62 mRNA (NM_006559) G31C4B G31C4B Homo sapiens chromosome 1 clone RP4-758N20* (AL03705) G31C4C G31C4C No match G31C5A Human transmembrane protein BRI (BRI) mRNA (AF152462) G31C5B G31C5B No match G31C5C G31C5C G31C5C No match G31C5D G31C5D No match G31C5E G31C5E G31C5E Human capping protein muscle Z-line, α1 mRNA (NM_003832) G31C5F No match G31C5G G31C5G G31C5G No match G31C5H G31C5H Human gene for casein kinase II subunit β (X57152) G31C6A G31C6A G31C6A Human L-3-phosphoserine-phosphatase homo (CO9) Mrna (NM_003832) G31C6B G31C6B Human EST zh46b08.sl* (W93382) G32C2A G32C2A No match G32C2B G32C2B G32C2B Human general transcription factor IIB (GTF2B) mRNA (NM_001514) G32C2C G32C2C G32C2C Human clone 3A ETS-like protein mRNA* (U30172) G32C3A G32C3A Human cDNA FLJ10841 fis, clone NT2RP4001339 (AK001703) G32C3B G32C3B Human NADH dehydrogenase subunit 6 (6137796) G32C3C G32C3C No match G32C4A G32C4A Human mRNA for KIAA1311 protein (AB037732) G32C4B G32G4B G32C4B Human NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4 (6137796) G32C4C No match G32C4D G32C4D G32C4D No match G32C4E Human chromosome 17, clone HCIT48C15 (AC003104) G32C5A G32C5A G32C5A No match G32C5B Human S1H003 mRNA (AF077040) G32C6 G32C6 G32C6 Human ubiquitin specific protease 3 (USP3) mRNA (NM_006537) G32C7 G32C7 G32C7 Human procollagen-proline, 2-oxoglutarate 4-dioxygenase (proline 4- hydroxylase), α polypeptide 1 (P4HA1) mRNA (NM_000917)

[0110] TABLE 2 Cloned cDNA fragments and their Reverse Northern Blot analysis Size Fold of amplified cDNA in cancer Clone (bp) tissue cDNA fragment sequence G30CA 204 2.08 AAGCTTGGTGACAGCTGGTTGTCCAAGATAGAATCTTAGTTCAACTTTAAATTTGCCCACAGAACCC [SEQ ID NO:5] TCTAAATCCCCTTGTAAATTTAACTGTTAGTCCAAAGAGGAACAGCTCTTTGGACACTAGGAAAAAA CCTTGTAGAGAGAGTAAAAAATTTAACACCCATAGTAGGCCTAAAAGCAGCCACCAAAAAAAAAAAG CTT G30CB 207 2.64 AAGCCTTGGTGACATAGTATGGTAATAACAATCATCAAACATCTTTAGTTGACAAGAATTTGAAATG [SEQ ID NO:6] GATAGTGGGGCCGGGCGCAGTGGCTCATGCTGTAATCCCAGCAATAAGTGAGGCCTAGATGAGCAAA TCACTGGAGCCCAGAAGTTCGAGACCAGCCTGAGCAACATGACGAAACCCCGTCTCTACAAAAAAAA AAAGCTT G30CC 204 1.94 AAGCTTGGTGACAACAAGAAACTAGGAGAATGGGTAGGCCTTTGTAAAATTGACAGAGAGGGGAAA [SEQ ID NO:7] CCCCGTAAAGTGGTTGGTTGCAGTTGTGTAGTAGTTAAGGACTATGGCAAGGAGTCTCAGGCCAAG GATGTCATTGAAGAGTATTTCAAATGCAAGAAATGAAGAAATAAATCTTTGGCTCACAAAAAAAAA AAGCTT G30CD 207 3.00 AAGCTTGGTGACAAACATATCCTTTCAAGACAGAAAGAGACAGGAGACATGAGTCTTTGCCGGAGA [SEQ ID NO:8] AAAGCAGCTCAAGAACACATGTGCAGTCACTGGTGTCACCCTGGATAGGCAAGGGATAACTCTTCT AACACAAAATAAGTGTTTTATGTTTGGAATAAAGTCAACCTTGTTTCTACTGTTTTATACAAAAAA AAAAAGCTT G30CE 206 4.27 AAGCTTGGTGACAGGAATAGAAAATGGTACAGCCACTGTGGGAAACAGTTTGGCAGTTCTTTAGAAA [SEQ ID NO:9] GCTGAACATAGAATTACCATAGGATCTAGCAGTTCTTCTAGGTACATACCCCAAAGAATTGAAAGCA AGGACTTGAACAGATATTTGTACACCCATGTTCATAGCAGCAGTTTTCACAACAGCCAAAAAAAAA AGCTT G30CH 202 3.55 AAGCTTGGTGACACTGAGCAAATAAATATGTTGAGAATGATGACAGCAAGATTTCTCCATTAGAGAA [SEQ ID NO:10] GGTATTTATAAAAATAGGAATGAGGAGAGCTAGAAACCCTGGAGTGTGGCATTAGAATAGAACTCAT ATCTTTTAAATATATAGGAACAAATAAATAAATTGTTGTGTGTGCACATATGCAAAAAAAAAAAGCT T G30CI 207 2.13 AAGCTTGGTGACAAGAAAGCCATGGTGTGGGACATGCGCTCCGGCCAGTGCGTGCAGGCCTTTGAAA [SEQ ID NO:11] CACATGAATCCGACATCAACAGTGTCCGGTACTACCCCAGTGGAGATGCCTTTGCTTCAGGGTCAGA TGACGCTACGTGTCGCCTCTATGACCTGCGGGCAGATAGGGAGGTTGCCATCTATTCCAAAAAAAAA AAGCTT G30CK 206 1.68 AAGCTTGGTGACATAGCAAGACTCTGTCTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACCTACTATAGGCCTGCAATA [SEQ ID NO:12] GTGCCTCATGCCTGTAATCCCAGCACTATGGGAGGCCAAAGTGGGAGGATTGCTTGAGACTAGGAGT TTGAGACCAGCCTGGGGAACATAACGTGACCCTGTTTCTACCAACACCCCCCGCCCCAAAAAAAAAA AGCTT G31C4B 258 1.67 AAGCTTAGTCAAGXGGAAGGAATTGATACAAAAXXXXGAGGGGCTAATTATAGAAXXCAAGTCCCTT [SEQ ID NO:13] CGTAGGTGTGGGAGATAATCCAGTGCATAATTGGAGGAGTTAGTCTTTXAAAGTATATGACCATGGA GTGGTTGGCTGTGTGTGGTGGAAGAAAAGATAATTAGAAATGCAGGCATTCAAAGAACTTAAAGGCC ATATGTTAAGATATTTTAAGCCTTAAGACTGGATGxGTTACCAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT G31C4C 254 1.65 AAGCTTAGTCAAGTACATTAAATGGCATTCAAGTTGAAAAAGAAGTTAAACTATCTGTTTACAAATG [SEQ ID NO:14] ACATGATCTTATCTATAGAAAATCACAAGGGAAATCACAAAAATCTGTTAAAACTAATGATCGAGTT CAGCAAGTTGCAGAATACAAGTTCAATATACATAAATATATTTCTAGACAGTTGCAATGAACATACA AAAATGAAATTACAAAAAACGGTTGTTACCAATAACTCAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT G31C5C 183 1.65 AAGCTTAGTCAAGAGGCATAAAGGTTTAGCAXGTTAAGGCAGAGATATAGATGXTTTTTAGAAAGGT [SEQ ID NO:15] CTAAATACAATTCCTAGAAAXAAAAATATACTGAGATTATCAGATTATGCATTGCAGAAGGTTAGAT TAGTGATCTTGAAGACATAATCATAGAATGTATCAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT G31C5D 176 2.31 AAGCTTAGTCAAGGCAAAATAACAAAAGGATTAAAAATAAAATAATGGCCAGCAATATATCAGAAAA [SEQ ID NO:16] CAAAACAGGGAAAGAAATCAGTTAGCTGACCTAGATCTCAGACAAAGTAGAAAATAAGACAAAACAC TTTCTCCCCTCATCTCTGCTCACCCCCAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT G31CE 179 3.57 AAGCTTAGTCAAGCAAGTTTGTTCCAGGTGACCCATTGAGCTGTGTATGCATTTTTGTTTATTTCA [SEQ ID NO:17] ATAAAATATATTTGTATTATTTGTCCTTCATACTATCCATCCATACCACACTATCTTCTGTATCAG GTAGTCTAATAGAAATATACCTGTTTTGTTCCAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT G31C5G 179 4.25 AAGCTTAGTCAAGAGGAAGAGGTAATGCCTTTAAGTTAAAGGCCGGTCAAACACGATGACTCACAC [SEQ ID NO:18] CTGTAATTCCACTATAAATAACTAAGGCAGGAGGATCACTTGAGCCTAGGAGTTTGAGACAGCCTA AATAACACAGCAAGACGGTGTCTCCATATATCAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT G31C6A 242 2.58 AAGCTTAGTCAAGGATAACGCCTAAATGGTATATCACTGATTTTGTAGAGCTGCTGGGAGAACCGG [SEQ ID NO:19] AAGAATAACATCCATTGTCATACAGCTCCAAACAACTTCAGATGAATTTTTACAAGTTACACAGAT TGATACTGTTTGCTTACAATTGCCTATTACAACTTGCTATAGAAAGTTGGTACAGATGATCTGCAC TGTCAAGTAAACTACAGTTAGGAATCCTCAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT C31C6B 243 2.33 AAGCTTAGTCAAGGTATCAAGATTTTCTTCATGCCATTACTACAGAAACAGGGTAGAATACTCATAG [SEQ ID NO: 20] TTCTTCGGCTCAAGAGCAGCAGAGAGTTTCTGACAAGTATTTTTGCATTTCGTAAAATGGTAGTCTA AGTTGGAACTCAGTAAACTATTTTTGTTTTCAATGAGGGGAAGTGTAGAACTGTAGTACTCTCAAAT TATTTTTTCTCAAATTGGCCTTTGTGCAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT G32C2A 312 1.78 AAGCTTCCACAGCACCTGTGTATACTTCCATTATGGCATGTAACATGCTGGCAAGAAATTGATTCAT [SEQ ID NO:21] TGGGTTGTGTCTTCTCAGCTGCCTGAAGAATGAAACATATACTCTAGTTTCATATGCCCAGCATTG TACACAACTTGACACATCACAGCAGCTCTAGGAAAGCACATAGGCTGACAACTGAGTGAACAACCCA CTGACTGTGTGTCGTTCAGGGTTGGGAAGCAAGGGCAGGTCTCTGTGCCCCATCTCTAGCTTTTCC TCAACTTAGGCTTTATAAACCCTTGCATCAAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT G32C2B 311 2.44 AAGCTTCCACAGCTATAAATTGAGGCAGCTAACGTCAAATTCTTGAATACAAAACTTTGCCTGTTGT [SEQ ID NO:22] ACATAGCCTATACAAAATGCTGGGTTGAGCCTTTCATGAGGAAAAACAAAAGACATGGTACGCATTC CAGGGCTGAATACTATTGCTTGGCATTCTGTAGTATATACTATGTGAAACATATTTAATGATTTAA ATTTCTTATCAAATTTCTTTTGTAGCAATCTAGGAAACCGGTATTTTGGAAGATATTTGAAATTATG TAATTCTTGAATAAACATTTTCGAACTCAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT G32C2C 284 1.56 AGGCAGCCGGACTCCTGTCTCACCTACATTAACCCATGCATACTGTATGCCAATAAACTCACTTTG [SEQ ID NO:23] GTATATCCGGCGTCACATGCAGAGAGGAACTCTGCGNGNCAAAGTGTTGCTTCTTAAAGTTTCATTA TTGGCAACTAGAGGGTTGTTTTTAATGCATGGAAACTAAACAGATTCCTCGGGGAGTTCCTGAAGGA ACCAGGTGGGCAAACCTTTGCTTATATACATGCGGCCTCACCTGGAAGAGAAATAAACCACTTGTAC CAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT G32C3A 307 2.00 AAGCTTCCACAGCATCCATTGTTGAAATAACCATTTTCAGTTGTGATGCCTTAACTAAGAAGCCAAT [SEQ ID NO:24] TGTTAGCCTGAAATGCAATCTTGGTAGCCAGTTTCAATGAAGCTAGAGATTAGTCAGAAAAAGTTAG CTGTTGGGCTTTAGAAAGGNNTTTTGAGTCCTGTCATTTCTACTTGGGAGCATTTTGGAGCAGATTA GTCTTTCAGTATAAAAACAAGTGGCTACCTGATGGAAACTTTTCCTACCCTTATAGGAAACTGAGCA CAAGCTGAATGATATTGCTGCTGCAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT G32C3B 310 1.74 AAGCTTCCACAGCACCATCCTACCTCCATGCTAACCCCACTAAAACACTCACCAGACCTCAACCCCT [SEQ ID NO:25] GACCCCCATGCCTCAGGATACTCCTCAATAGCCATCGCTGTAGTATACCCAAAGACAACCATCATTC CCCCTAAATAAATTAAAAAAACTATTAAACCCATATAACCTCCCCCAAAATTCAGAATAATAACACA CCCGACCACACCGCTAACAACCAATACTAAACCCCCATAAATAGGAGAAGGCTTAGAAGAAAACCCC ACAAACCCCATTACTAAACCCACACTCAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT G32C3C 303 2.97 AAGCTTCCACAGCCCACTGACTCAAATGGTAATCTCTTTTGGCAACACCCACACAGACACACCCAGG [SEQ ID NO:26] ATTAATACTTTGTATCCCTCATTCCAATTAAGTTGACACTCAGTATTAACCATCATATATGGCAACA TATCTTTCTGGATAGGACCTAGAGAAACTTTCAAATAATGACTTGTAACTTCTCTACACTGAAGGAA TATATACACAATTTGTAATTTAATTTTGAGTGTATATTGACAAACTACATGTATCTACAAATTACCT TTAATTCAATTGCAACCCTCAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT G32C4B 260 3.94 AAGCTTCCACAGCCACAGAACTAATCATATTTTATATCTTCTTCGAAACCACACTTATCCCCACCTT [SEQ ID NO:27] GGCTATCATCACCCGATGAGGCAACCAGCCAGAACGCCTGAACGCAGGCACATACTTCCTATTCTAC ACCCTAGTAGGCTCCCTTCCCCTACTCATCGCACTAATTTACACTCACAACACCCTAGGCTCACTAA ACATTCTACTACTCACTCTCACTGCCCAAGAACTATCAAACTCCAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT G32C4D 264 1.58 AAGCTTCCACAGCACCAACAAAAGTTAACGTTGCATGTTTCACTATTTGGTTTTTAACCTACATTC [SEQ ID NO:28] CAAATGGCTTTTACAACAGTTATAATAAAATGATAACTGCAAAGGCATTGTGTAGCTAAATGAAAA TGTTGTAAATGTGATAATGAAACACGGCCAAAGTTTTGACAATTAGGCAATAGATGGAGATAAAAA TTTTAGACTAAAGTGTACAATAAAATACACACACAGCCAAACTCACTCCAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT G32C5A 257 1.62 AAGCTTCCACAGCAACAACCAACATAGCTAATACAGAAAGCAGTCAGCAGACTCTACAGAATTCCC [SEQ ID NO:29] AGTTTCTTTTAACAAGGTAGCTCATTTGTTAATAGAATTTTGTTTGGGAAGTAATATTTTATTGCC ACTACAGTCTGGAATTATCTTTTCTCTTTTGTGCATTATATTTCTTAAAATTTTGTGTTTGATTAA AACTCACAGATCTCTGATTAAAACGCATATTCAGTACTTTCCCCAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT G32C6 250 1.93 AAGCTTCCACAGCTATAATGGACATCAGGTTGACTCTAAATCAAGGATCATGTGTGCACAATACTTG [SEQ ID NO:30] TGGCCCACAAAATTTCACAATGACTGCTGAGGAATCATTCTTTTTGCCTGTAAAATATAACAAAGGG CATCATTAAGTAGACCAGGTAATTACTGCTTGTCTCTCAAGGCTGCTGTCTTTATCAGCACTAACTA AATAAATTTGTTGGTTCAGTTGTACTTGTCCTGCAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT G32C7 224 2.23 AAGCTTCCACAGCAGAGGAATTACAGGTAGCAAATTATGGAGTTGGAGGACAGTATGAACCCCATTT [SEQ ID NO:31] TGACTTTGCACGGAAAGATGAGCCAGATGCTTTCAAAGAGCTGGGGACAGGAAATAGAATTGCTACA TGGCTGTTTTATATGAGTGATGTGTCTGCAGGAGGAGCCACTGTTTTTCCTGAAGTTGGAGCTAGTG TTTGGCCCAAAAAAAAAAAGCTT

Bibliography

[0111] Anton-Culver et al., 1992, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 166: 1507-1514.

[0112] Boring et al., 1994, CA Cancer J. Clin. 44: 7-26.

[0113] Berek et al., 1981, Cancer 48: 2734-2741.

[0114] Bethwaite et al., 1992, Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 99: 745-750.

[0115] Brisson et al., 1994, Am. J. Epidemiol. 140: 700-710.

[0116] Burke et al., 1987, Obstet. Gynecol. 69: 382-385.

[0117] Canavan and Doshi, 2000, Am Fam Physician 61: 1369-1376.

[0118] Douillard and Hoffman, 1981, Basic Facts about Hybridomas, in Compendium of Immunology Vol. II, ed. by Schwartz.

[0119] Duggan, 1998, Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 19: 338-344.

[0120] FIGO News, 1987, In J. Gynaecol Obstet 25: 87.

[0121] Gallup et al., 1985, Obstetrics and Gynecology 65: 416-422.

[0122] Goodman et al., 1989, Gynecol. Oncol. 33: 241-247.

[0123] Gustafsson et al., 1989, Br. J. Cancer 60: 132-141.

[0124] Herrington et al., 1995, Cytopathlology 6: 176-189.

[0125] Ho et al., 1998, N. Engl. J. Med. 338: 423-428.

[0126] Kohler and Milstein, 1975, Nature 256: 495-499.

[0127] Kohler and Milstein, 1976, European Journal of Immunology 6: 511-519.

[0128] Kjaer et al., 1997, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 6: 799-805.

[0129] Krivak et al., 2000, Gynecol. Oncol. 77: 334-335.

[0130] Lazo, 1999, Br. J. Cancer 80: 2008-2018.

[0131] Lanciano, 1996, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 21: 113-115.

[0132] Liang et al., 1994, Nucl. Acids. Res. 22: 5763-5764.

[0133] Ostor, 1993, Int. J. Gynecol Pathol. 12: 186-192.

[0134] Piamsomboon et al., 1996, Anticancer Drugs. 7: 800-804.

[0135] Pisani et al., 1993, Int. J. Cancer 55: 891-903.

[0136] Pisani et al., 1997, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 6: 387-400.

[0137] Poynor et al., 1995, Gynecol Oncol. 57: 158-164.

[0138] Rosl et al., 1989, Mol. Carcinog. 2: 72-80.

[0139] Scheffner et al., 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88: 5523-5527.

[0140] Schiffman et al., 1993, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 85: 958-964.

[0141] Siadat-Pajouh et al., 1994, J. Histochem Cytochem. 42: 1503-1512.

[0142] Soong et al., 1992, The J. of Immunology 149: 2008-2020.

[0143] Steren et al., 1993, Gynecol Oncol. 48: 355-359.

[0144] Strang et al., 1987, Anticancer Research 7(4B): 807-810.

[0145] Tay et al., 1997, Singapore Med. J. 38: 520-524.

[0146] Van Oortmarssen et al., 1991, Br. J. Cancer 64: 559-565.

[0147] Vizaino et al., 1998, In. J. Cancer 75: 536-545.

[0148] Werner-Wasik et al., 1995, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 32: 1309-1317.

[0149] Wingo et al., 1995, CA Cancer J. Clin. 45: 8-30.

[0150] Yazigi et al., 1990, Obstet. Gynecol. 75: 1012-1015.

[0151] Zaitoun et al., 2000, J. Clin. Pathol. 53: 191-196.

1 31 1 16 DNA Artificial Sequence Primer 1 gttttttttt ttcgaa 16 2 13 DNA Artificial Sequence Primer 2 aagcttggtg aca 13 3 13 DNA Artificial Sequence Primer 3 aagcttagtc aag 13 4 13 DNA Artificial Sequence Primer 4 aagcttccac agc 13 5 204 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 5 aagcttggtg acagctggtt gtccaagata gaatcttagt tcaactttaa atttgcccac 60 agaaccctct aaatcccctt gtaaatttaa ctgttagtcc aaagaggaac agctctttgg 120 acactaggaa aaaaccttgt agagagagta aaaaatttaa cacccatagt aggcctaaaa 180 gcagccacca aaaaaaaaaa gctt 204 6 207 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 6 aagcttggtg acatagtatg gtaataacaa tcatcaaaca tctttagttg acaagaattt 60 gaaatggata gtggggccgg gcgcagtggc tcatgctgta atcccagcaa taagtgaggc 120 ctagatgagc aaatcactgg agcccagaag ttcgagacca gcctgagcaa catgacgaaa 180 ccccgtctct acaaaaaaaa aaagctt 207 7 204 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 7 aagcttggtg acaacaagaa actaggagaa tgggtaggcc tttgtaaaat tgacagagag 60 gggaaacccc gtaaagtggt tggttgcagt tgtgtagtag ttaaggacta tggcaaggag 120 tctcaggcca aggatgtcat tgaagagtat ttcaaatgca agaaatgaag aaataaatct 180 ttggctcaca aaaaaaaaaa gctt 204 8 207 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 8 aagcttggtg acaaacatat cctttcaaga cagaaagaga caggagacat gagtctttgc 60 cggagaaaag cagctcaaga acacatgtgc agtcactggt gtcaccctgg ataggcaagg 120 gataactctt ctaacacaaa ataagtgttt tatgtttgga ataaagtcaa ccttgtttct 180 actgttttat acaaaaaaaa aaagctt 207 9 206 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 9 aagcttggtg acaggaatag aaaatggtac agccactgtg ggaaacagtt tggcagttct 60 ttagaaagct gaacatagaa ttaccatagg atctagcagt tcttctaggt acatacccca 120 aagaattgaa agcaaggact tgaacagata tttgtacacc catgttcata gcagcagttt 180 tcacaacagc caaaaaaaaa aagctt 206 10 202 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 10 aagcttggtg acactgagca aataaatatg ttgagaatga tgacagcaag atttctccat 60 tagagaaggt atttataaaa ataggaatga ggagagctag aaaccctgga gtgtggcatt 120 agaatagaac tcatatcttt taaatatata ggaacaaata aataaattgt tgtgtgtgca 180 catatgcaaa aaaaaaaagc tt 202 11 207 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 11 aagcttggtg acaagaaagc catggtgtgg gacatgcgct ccggccagtg cgtgcaggcc 60 tttgaaacac atgaatccga catcaacagt gtccggtact accccagtgg agatgccttt 120 gcttcagggt cagatgacgc tacgtgtcgc ctctatgacc tgcgggcaga tagggaggtt 180 gccatctatt ccaaaaaaaa aaagctt 207 12 206 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 12 aagcttggtg acatagcaag actctgtcta aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaacct actataggcc 60 tgcaatagtg cctcatgcct gtaatcccag cactatggga ggccaaagtg ggaggattgc 120 ttgagactag gagtttgaga ccagcctggg gaacataacg tgaccctgtt tctaccaaca 180 ccccccgccc caaaaaaaaa aagctt 206 13 258 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 13 aagcttagtc aagnggaagg aattgataca aaannnngag gggctaatta tagaanncaa 60 gtcccttcgt aggtgtggga gataatccag tgcataattg gaggagttag tctttnaaag 120 tatatgacca tggagtggtt ggctgtgtgt ggtggaagaa aagataatta gaaatgcagg 180 cattcaaaga acttaaaggc catatgttaa gatattttaa gccttaagac tggatgngtt 240 accaaaaaaa aaaagctt 258 14 254 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 14 aagcttagtc aagtacatta aatggcattc aagttgaaaa agaagttaaa ctatctgttt 60 acaaatgaca tgatcttatc tatagaaaat cacaagggaa atcacaaaaa tctgttaaaa 120 ctaatgatcg agttcagcaa gttgcagaat acaagttcaa tatacataaa tatatttcta 180 gacagttgca atgaacatac aaaaatgaaa ttacaaaaaa cggttgttac caataactca 240 aaaaaaaaaa gctt 254 15 183 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 15 aagcttagtc aagaggcata aaggtttagc angttaaggc agagatatag atgnttttta 60 gaaaggtcta aatacaattc ctagaaanaa aaatatactg agattatcag attatgcatt 120 gcagaaggtt agattagtga tcttgaagac ataatcatag aatgtatcaa aaaaaaaaag 180 ctt 183 16 176 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 16 aagcttagtc aaggcaaaat aacaaaagga ttaaaaataa aataatggcc agcaatatat 60 cagaaaacaa aacagggaaa gaaatcagtt agctgaccta gatctcagac aaagtagaaa 120 ataagacaaa acactttctc ccctcatctc tgctcacccc caaaaaaaaa aagctt 176 17 179 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 17 aagcttagtc aagcaagttt gttccaggtg acccattgag ctgtgtatgc atttttgttt 60 atttcaataa aatatatttg tattatttgt ccttcatact atccatccat accacactat 120 cttctgtatc aggtagtcta atagaaatat acctgttttg ttccaaaaaa aaaaagctt 179 18 179 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 18 aagcttagtc aagaggaaga ggtaatgcct ttaagttaaa ggccggtcaa acacgatgac 60 tcacacctgt aattccacta taaataacta aggcaggagg atcacttgag cctaggagtt 120 tgagacagcc taaataacac agcaagacgg tgtctccata tatcaaaaaa aaaaagctt 179 19 242 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 19 aagcttagtc aaggataacg cctaaatggt atatcactga ttttgtagag ctgctgggag 60 aaccggaaga ataacatcca ttgtcataca gctccaaaca acttcagatg aatttttaca 120 agttacacag attgatactg tttgcttaca attgcctatt acaacttgct atagaaagtt 180 ggtacagatg atctgcactg tcaagtaaac tacagttagg aatcctcaaa aaaaaaaagc 240 tt 242 20 243 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 20 aagcttagtc aaggtatcaa gattttcttc atgccattac tacagaaaca gggtagaata 60 ctcatagttc ttcggctcaa gagcagcaga gagtttctga caagtatttt tgcatttggt 120 aaaatggtag tctaagttgg aactcagtaa actatttttg ttttcaatga ggggaagtgt 180 agaactgtag tactctcaaa ttattttttc tcaaattggc ctttgtgcaa aaaaaaaaag 240 ctt 243 21 312 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 21 aagcttccac agcacctgtg tatacttcca ttatggcatg taacatgctg gcaagaaatt 60 gattcattgg gttgtgtctt ctcagctgcc tgaagaatga aatcatatac tctagtttca 120 tatgcccagc attgtacaca acttgacaca tcacagcagc tctaggaaag cacataggct 180 gacaactgag tgaacaaccc actgactgtg tgtcgttcag ggttgggaaa gcaagggcag 240 gtctctgtgc cccatctcta gcttttcctc aacttaggct ttataaaccc ttgcatcaaa 300 aaaaaaaagc tt 312 22 311 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 22 aagcttccac agctataaat tgaggcagct aacgtcaaat tcttgaatac aaaactttgc 60 ctgttgtaca tagcctatac aaaatgctgg gttgagcctt tcatgaggaa aaacaaaaga 120 catggtacgc attccagggc tgaatactat tgcttggcat tctgtatgta tatactatgt 180 gaaacatatt taatgattta aatttcttat caaatttctt ttgtagcaat ctaggaaacc 240 ggtattttgg aagatatttg aaattatgta attcttgaat aaacattttc gaactcaaaa 300 aaaaaaagct t 311 23 284 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 23 aggcagccgg actccctgtc tcacctacat taacccatgc atactgtatg ccaataaact 60 cactttggta tatccggcgt cacatgcaga gaggaactct gcgngncaaa gtgttgcttc 120 ttaaagtttc attattggca actagagggt tgtttttaat gcatggaaac taaacagatt 180 cctcggggag ttcctgaagg aaccaggtgg gcaaaccttt gcttatatac atgcggcctc 240 acctggaaga gaaataaacc acttgtacca aaaaaaaaaa gctt 284 24 307 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 24 aagcttccac agcatccatt gttgaaataa ccattttcag ttgtgatgcc ttaactaaga 60 agccaattgt tagcctgaaa tgcaatcttg gtagccagtt tcaatgaagc tagagattag 120 tcagaaaaag ttagctgttg ggctttagaa aggnnttttg agtcctgtca tttctacttg 180 ggagcatttt ggagcagatt agtctttcag tataaaaaca agtggctacc tgatggaaac 240 ttttcctacc cttataggaa actgagcaca agctgaatga tattgctgct gcaaaaaaaa 300 aaagctt 307 25 310 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 25 aagcttccac agcaccatcc tacctccatg ctaaccccac taaaacactc accagacctc 60 aacccctgac ccccatgcct caggatactc ctcaatagcc atcgctgtag tatacccaaa 120 gacaaccatc attcccccta aataaattaa aaaaactatt aaacccatat aacctccccc 180 aaaattcaga ataataacac acccgaccac accgctaaca accaatacta aacccccata 240 aataggagaa ggcttagaag aaaaccccac aaaccccatt actaaaccca cactcaaaaa 300 aaaaaagctt 310 26 303 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 26 aagcttccac agcccactga ctcaaatggt aatctctttt ggcaacaccc acacagacac 60 acccaggatt aatactttgt atccctcatt ccaattaagt tgacactcag tattaaccat 120 catatatggc aacatatctt tctggatagg acctagagaa actttcaaat aatgacttgt 180 aacttctcta cactgaagga atatatacac aatttgtaat ttaattttga gtgtatattg 240 acaaactaca tgtatctaca aattaccttt aattcaattg caaccctcaa aaaaaaaaag 300 ctt 303 27 260 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 27 aagcttccac agccacagaa ctaatcatat tttatatctt cttcgaaacc acacttatcc 60 ccaccttggc tatcatcacc cgatgaggca accagccaga acgcctgaac gcaggcacat 120 acttcctatt ctacacccta gtaggctccc ttcccctact catcgcacta atttacactc 180 acaacaccct aggctcacta aacattctac tactcactct cactgcccaa gaactatcaa 240 actccaaaaa aaaaaagctt 260 28 264 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 28 aagcttccac agcaccaaca aaagttaacg ttgcatgttt cactatttgg tttttaacct 60 acattccaaa tggcttttac aacagttata ataaaatgat aactgcaaag gcattgtgta 120 gctaaatgaa aatgttgtaa atgtgataat gaaacacggc caaagttttg acaattaggc 180 aatagatgga gataaaaatt ttagactaaa gtgtacaata aaatacacac acacagccaa 240 actcactcca aaaaaaaaaa gctt 264 29 257 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 29 aagcttccac agcaacaacc aacatagcta atacagaaag cagtcagcag actctacaga 60 attcccagtt tcttttaaca aggtagctca tttgttaata gaattttgtt tgggaagtaa 120 tattttattg ccactacagt ctggaattat cttttctctt ttgtgcatta tatttcttaa 180 aattttgtgt ttgattaaaa ctcacagatc tctgattaaa acgcatattc agtactttcc 240 ccaaaaaaaa aaagctt 257 30 250 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 30 aagcttccac agctataatg gacatcaggt tgactctaaa tcaaggatca tgtgtgcaca 60 atacttgtgg cccacaaaat ttcacaatga ctgctgagga atcattcttt ttgcctgtaa 120 aatataacaa agggcatcat taagtagacc aggtaattac tgcttgtctc tcaaggctgc 180 tgtctttatc agcactaact aaataaattt gttggttcag ttgtacttgt cctgcaaaaa 240 aaaaaagctt 250 31 224 DNA Artificial Sequence Synthetic Sequence 31 aagcttccac agcagaggaa ttacaggtag caaattatgg agttggagga cagtatgaac 60 cccattttga ctttgcacgg aaagatgagc cagatgcttt caaagagctg gggacaggaa 120 atagaattgc tacatggctg ttttatatga gtgatgtgtc tgcaggagga gccactgttt 180 ttcctgaagt tggagctagt gtttggccca aaaaaaaaaa gctt 224 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for detecting a molecular marker associated with normal or cervical cancer tissue from a mammal, said method comprising; isolating total RNA from said cervical cancer tissue and corresponding tissue from a normal individual, generating complementary DNA molecules using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR); wherein said complementary DNA molecules comprise a sequence selected from the group consisting of G30CA(SEQ ID NO:5), G30CB(SEQ ID NO:6), G30CC(SEQ ID NO:7), G30CD(SEQ ID NO:8), G30CE(SEQ ID NO:9), G30CH(SEQ ID NO:10), G30CI(SEQ ID NO:11), G30CK(SEQ ID NO:12), G31C4B(SEQ ID NO:13), G31C4C(SEQ ID NO:14), G31C5C(SEQ ID NO:15), G31C5D(SEQ ID NO:16), G31C5E(SEQ ID NO:17), G31C5G(SEQ ID NO:18), G31C6B(SEQ ID NO:20), G32C2A(SEQ ID NO:21), G32C2B(SEQ ID NO:22), G32C2C(SEQ ID NO:23), G32C3A(SEQ ID NO:24), G32C3B(SEQ ID NO:25), G32C3C(SEQ ID NO:26), G32C4B(SEQ ID NO:27), G32C4D(SEQ ID NO:28), G32C5A(SEQ ID NO:29), G32C6(SEQ ID NO:30), and G32C7(SEQ ID NO:31): and, subjecting said DNA molecules to separation means such that the presence or absence or relative presence or absence of complementary DNA molecules can be detected from cervical cancer tissue relative to normal tissue wherein the presence or absence of a complementary DNA molecule in one type of tissue relative to another is indicative of a molecular marker associated with normal or cervical cancer tissue.
 2. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G30CA(SEQ ID NO:5).
 3. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G30CB(SEQ ID NO:6).
 4. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G30CC(SEQ ID NO:7).
 5. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G30CD(SEQ ID NO:8).
 6. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G30CE(SEQ ID NO:9).
 7. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G30CH(SEQ ID NO:10).
 8. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G30CI(SEQ ID NO:11).
 9. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G30CK(SEQ ID NO:12).
 10. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G31C4B(SEQ ID NO:13).
 11. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G31C4C(SEQ ID NO:14).
 12. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G31C5C(SEQ ID NO:15).
 13. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G31C5D(SEQ ID NO:16).
 14. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G31C5E(SEQ ID NO:17).
 15. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G31C5G(SEQ ID NO:18).
 16. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G31C6B(SEQ ID NO:20).
 17. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G32C2A(SEQ ID NO:21).
 18. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G32C2B(SEQ ID NO:22).
 19. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G32C2C(SEQ ID NO:23).
 20. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G32C3A(SEQ ID NO:24).
 21. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G32C3B(SEQ ID NO:25).
 22. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G32C3C(SEQ ID NO:26).
 23. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G32C4B(SEQ ID NO:27).
 24. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G32C4D(SEQ ID NO:28).
 25. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G32C5A(SEQ ID NO:29).
 26. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G32C6(SEQ ID NO:30).
 27. A method according to claim 1 wherein the DNA molecules comprise the sequence of G32C7(SEQ ID NO:31).
 28. A method according to claim 1 or claim 23 wherein the DNA molecules encode an NADH dehydrogenase.
 29. A method according to claim 1 or claim 4 wherein the DNA molecules encode ribosomal protein S12.
 30. A method according to claim 1 wherein a primer used in RT-PCR is as set forth in SEQ ID NO:
 1. 31. A method according to claim 1 wherein a primer used in RT-PCR is as set forth in SEQ ID NO:2.
 32. A method according to claim 1 wherein a primer used in RT-PCR is as set forth in SEQ ID NO:3.
 33. A method according to claim 1 wherein primer used in RT-PCR is as set forth in SEQ ID NO:4.
 34. An isolated polynucleotide comprising a sequence of nucleotides selected from the group consisting of G30CE(SEQ ID NO:9), G30CK(SEQ ID NO:12), G31C4C(SEQ ID NO:14), G31C5C(SEQ ID NO:15), G31C5D(SEQ ID NO:16), G31C5G(SEQ ID NO:18), G32C2A(SEQ ID NO:21), G32C3C(SEQ ID NO:26), G32C4D(SEQ ID NO:28), and G32C5A(SEQ ID NO:29); wherein said polynucleotide is expressed differentially in cervical cancer cells relative to matched normal cervical epithelial cells in a mammal.
 35. Use of an isolated genetic sequence selected from 30CE(SEQ ID NO:9), G30CK(SEQ ID NO:12), G31C4C(SEQ ID NO:14), G31C5C(SEQ ID NO:15), G31C5D(SEQ ID NO:16), G31C5G(SEQ ID NO:18), G32C2A(SEQ ID NO:21), G32C3C(SEQ ID NO:26), G32C4D(SEQ ID NO:28), and G32C5A(SEQ ID NO:29); in distinguishing between normal tissue and cervical cancer tissue. 